Learning experiences of pre-clinical medical students in virtual problem-based learning amidst the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction: Medical schools universally responded by migrating teaching and learning to virtual learning environments (VLE) due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of virtual problem-based learning (PBL) in lieu of face-to-face sessions seems to be an appropriate response, but its effe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Foong, Chan Choong, Lye, An Jie, Aziz, Che Rafidah, Hong, Wei-Han, Pallath, Vinod, Cockburn, Jessica Grace, Rosli, Siti Nurjawahir, Krishnan, Kuhan, Sivalingam, Prahaladhan, Zulkepli, Noor Filzati, Vadivelu, Jamuna
Format: Article
Published: Centre for Medical Education (CenMed) Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/43159/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85123287140&doi=10.29060%2fTAPS.2022-7-1%2fOA2493&partnerID=40&md5=0a2d0c5a8ca24ef010ea6df0a75f0994
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction: Medical schools universally responded by migrating teaching and learning to virtual learning environments (VLE) due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of virtual problem-based learning (PBL) in lieu of face-to-face sessions seems to be an appropriate response, but its effectiveness was understudied. The study compared the learning experiences of pre-clinical medical students at the beginning and completion of the virtual PBL. Methods: The study was conducted at the University of Malaya, a public-funded university in Malaysia. A 12-item questionnaire was developed and validated to assess the learning experiences of students conducting virtual PBL sessions. Principal component analysis and test for internal consistency suggested that the questionnaire is valid and reliable. The questionnaire was administered to pre-clinical students (Year 1 and Year 2) twice: at the beginning and the end of the virtual PBL implementation. Their responses were compared for the domains “learning”, “confidence” and “concern”. Results: Three hundred and forty-four pre-clinical students were recruited but only 275 students (80) responded to both the initial and final questionnaires. Based on the responses, the learning experiences of students generally improved by the completion of the virtual PBL implementation. Students were most convinced that they obtained and understood the information given during the virtual PBL. However, they continued to be worried about passing the clinical examination and content acquisition. Conclusion: The study supports the feasibility of virtual PBL as an acceptable alternative to replace face-to-face PBL during the COVID-19 pandemic. © 2022 TAPS. All rights reserved.