A comparison between content and black-box HRM performance studies: From direct relationships to psychological theory
Over the past few decades, there has been a consistent and concerted scholarly effort to demonstrate a relationship between HRM systems and organizational performance. The HRM performance studies (HRM-P) utilize different theoretical approaches and methodologies to reveal this relationship. HRM-P co...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
American Scientific Publishers
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/81241/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.10002 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Over the past few decades, there has been a consistent and concerted scholarly effort to demonstrate a relationship between HRM systems and organizational performance. The HRM performance studies (HRM-P) utilize different theoretical approaches and methodologies to reveal this relationship. HRM-P content studies were the earliest attempt utilize empirical and positivist methodology to reveal the impact of HRM systems on organizational performance. Black-box HRM-P also utilizes the positivist approach but establishes a link between HRM and performance through intervening employee affective and attitudinal outcomes. This paper presents a review of content and black-box HRM-P studies. |
|---|