Relationship between performance appraisal politics and job satisfaction :does distributive justice act as a mediating role?
The study was conducted to examine the mediating role of distributive justice in the relationship between performance appraisal politics and job satisfaction. This study used a sample of 150 usable questionnaires that were gathered from employees who have worked in the management and n...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Final Year Project Report |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, UNIMAS
2007
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/6741/8/AWANGKU%20MOHAMAD%20NAJIB%2024pgs.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/6741/10/Relationship%20between%20performance%20FText%20%281%29.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/6741/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The study was conducted to examine the mediating role of distributive justice in the relationship between performance appraisal politics and job satisfaction.
This study used a sample of 150 usable questionnaires
that were gathered from employees who have worked in the
management and non-management level in Pejabat Pos Malaysia Berhad, Sarawak.Outcomes of stepwise regression analysis showed that the inclusion of
distributive justice into analysis had increased effect of performance appraisal politics
(i.e., motivational motive and punishment motive) on job satisfaction. This result
demonstrates that distributive just
ice does act as a full mediator in the performance
appraisal
practices of the organization. In addition,
implications of this study to
performance appraisal practice and theory,
methodological and conceptual limitations, as
well as directions for
future research, are discussed. |
|---|