Applying NVIVO analysis in conduct of conflict in Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) Malaysia
The purposes of the research were first, to identify conduct of conflict in Parti Keadilan Rakyat (the People’s Justice Party). And second, to identify the implementation of the conduct of conflict in Parti Keadilan Rakyat (the People’s Justice Party). This study utilized a qualitative method and nv...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://repo.uum.edu.my/9251/1/P.pdf http://repo.uum.edu.my/9251/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The purposes of the research were first, to identify conduct of conflict in Parti Keadilan Rakyat (the People’s Justice Party). And second, to identify the implementation of the conduct of conflict in Parti Keadilan Rakyat (the People’s Justice Party). This study utilized a qualitative method and nvivo analysis to reveal the conceptions of conduct of conflict in the People’s Justice Party (PKR).
Research findings are; 1) the conduct of conflict in the People’s Justice Party covers : level of conflict, qualification, law enforcement, typology of conflict, factor of conflict, leadership skill, training. 2) The three elements to obtain an emphasis in the implementation stage.Elaborated elements are included level of conflict covers interpersonal, intergroup, intragroup and interorganizational.Typology of conflict covers colaborator, competitor, accomodator, compromizing, and avoider. Leadership skill covers compromize, persuasive, rhetoric, democratic, charismatic,integrator and inspirational. Meanwhile, limitation of the study is, in general, qualitative research. First, this study is put on the interview. This means that researchers can in no way confirm that the information in the form of the story is true experience or manipulative. Human attitudes and actions can always be changed. Second, researchers have limitations in data access of the informant. Third, interpretation of data depends on the researcher. Fourth, informants were selected only from some members and leaders and thus cannot be claimed as representing the communication patterns
implemented by everyone. |
|---|