Gaya Pemikiran Strategik Yang Diamalkan Oleh Pengurus Dan Hubungannya Dengan Pencapaian Organisasi Pendidikan
The objectives of this research is to identify the strategic thinking styles practiced by a managers of educational organizations, to determine if the strategic management styles practiced by the managers are directly related to the performance of the school, to identify the significance of the rela...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
2000
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://etd.uum.edu.my/126/1/ABD._RAHMAN_BIN_HAJI_HASHIM_-_Gaya_pemikiran_strategik_yang_diamalkan_oleh_pengurus_....pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/126/2/ABD._RAHMAN_BIN_HAJI_HASHIM_-_Gaya_pemikiran_strategik_yang_diamalkan_oleh_pengurus_....pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/126/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The objectives of this research is to identify the strategic thinking styles practiced by a managers of educational organizations, to determine if the strategic management styles practiced by the managers are directly related to the performance of the school, to identify the significance of the relationship, if there is one, between the strategic thinking styles of the principal and the
performance of the school, and lastly, to identify the factors contributing to successful performance of the school.
Questionnaire is used to collect the data from the respondents to determine the level of significance between the strategic thinking styles and the achievement of the educational organization. To evaluate the performance of the organization, secondary data from journal, annual reports, bulletin and school homepage are used as supporting materials.
The SPSS application package, especially the Pearson’s r correlation and one-way ANOVA programs were used to analyze the collected data. The results show a significant and positive correlation between the strategic thinking styles of the managers with the achievement of the organizations.
This research achieved its objectives in answering all the questions raised. Although it manages to show a significant relationship, there is still room for further research into organizational achievement. Further research
need to be done to determine other variables that also contribute to organizational achievement. |
---|