Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network
Pocket Switched Network (PSN) is a branch of Delay Tolerant Network (DTN) which is intended to work in a challenged network. Challenged network is network with lack of infrastructure such as disaster area. As such, the network has intermittent connectivity. PSN provides a new paradigm to distribute...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Penerbit UTM Press
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/74359/1/DeniYulianti2016_PerformanceComparisonofBaselineRouting.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/74359/ https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85031735799&partnerID=40&md5=93f543eb6b3dcdeaa934f0c2ecee4397 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.utm.74359 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utm.743592017-11-22T12:07:41Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/74359/ Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network Yulianti, D. Mandala, S. Zainal, A. Nasien, D. Ngadi, M. A. Yahaya, C. QA Mathematics Pocket Switched Network (PSN) is a branch of Delay Tolerant Network (DTN) which is intended to work in a challenged network. Challenged network is network with lack of infrastructure such as disaster area. As such, the network has intermittent connectivity. PSN provides a new paradigm to distribute messages in the network by taking advantage of roaming nodes from one place to another. In this paper, network performances of eight PSN routing protocols are investigated namely, First Contact, Direct Delivery, Epidemic, PRotocol using History of Encounter and Transitivity (PRoPHET), Spray and Wait, Binary Spray and Wait, Fuzzy Spray, Adaptive Fuzzy Spray and Wait. The performance metrics are packet delivery ratio, overhead ratio and average latency. Opportunistic Network Environment (ONE) simulator is used to evaluate the network performance. Experiments show that Epidemic has the best performance in term of message delivery ratio, but it has the highest overhead ratio. Direct Delivery has the lowest overhead ratio (zero overhead ratio) and PRoPHET has the lowest latency average. Penerbit UTM Press 2016 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/74359/1/DeniYulianti2016_PerformanceComparisonofBaselineRouting.pdf Yulianti, D. and Mandala, S. and Zainal, A. and Nasien, D. and Ngadi, M. A. and Yahaya, C. (2016) Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network. Jurnal Teknologi, 78 (8-2). ISSN 0127-9696 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85031735799&partnerID=40&md5=93f543eb6b3dcdeaa934f0c2ecee4397 |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
building |
UTM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
content_source |
UTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utm.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
QA Mathematics |
spellingShingle |
QA Mathematics Yulianti, D. Mandala, S. Zainal, A. Nasien, D. Ngadi, M. A. Yahaya, C. Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network |
description |
Pocket Switched Network (PSN) is a branch of Delay Tolerant Network (DTN) which is intended to work in a challenged network. Challenged network is network with lack of infrastructure such as disaster area. As such, the network has intermittent connectivity. PSN provides a new paradigm to distribute messages in the network by taking advantage of roaming nodes from one place to another. In this paper, network performances of eight PSN routing protocols are investigated namely, First Contact, Direct Delivery, Epidemic, PRotocol using History of Encounter and Transitivity (PRoPHET), Spray and Wait, Binary Spray and Wait, Fuzzy Spray, Adaptive Fuzzy Spray and Wait. The performance metrics are packet delivery ratio, overhead ratio and average latency. Opportunistic Network Environment (ONE) simulator is used to evaluate the network performance. Experiments show that Epidemic has the best performance in term of message delivery ratio, but it has the highest overhead ratio. Direct Delivery has the lowest overhead ratio (zero overhead ratio) and PRoPHET has the lowest latency average. |
format |
Article |
author |
Yulianti, D. Mandala, S. Zainal, A. Nasien, D. Ngadi, M. A. Yahaya, C. |
author_facet |
Yulianti, D. Mandala, S. Zainal, A. Nasien, D. Ngadi, M. A. Yahaya, C. |
author_sort |
Yulianti, D. |
title |
Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network |
title_short |
Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network |
title_full |
Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network |
title_fullStr |
Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network |
title_sort |
performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network |
publisher |
Penerbit UTM Press |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/74359/1/DeniYulianti2016_PerformanceComparisonofBaselineRouting.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/74359/ https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85031735799&partnerID=40&md5=93f543eb6b3dcdeaa934f0c2ecee4397 |
_version_ |
1643656841349038080 |
score |
13.211869 |