Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network

Pocket Switched Network (PSN) is a branch of Delay Tolerant Network (DTN) which is intended to work in a challenged network. Challenged network is network with lack of infrastructure such as disaster area. As such, the network has intermittent connectivity. PSN provides a new paradigm to distribute...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yulianti, D., Mandala, S., Zainal, A., Nasien, D., Ngadi, M. A., Yahaya, C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit UTM Press 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/74359/1/DeniYulianti2016_PerformanceComparisonofBaselineRouting.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/74359/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85031735799&partnerID=40&md5=93f543eb6b3dcdeaa934f0c2ecee4397
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.74359
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.743592017-11-22T12:07:41Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/74359/ Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network Yulianti, D. Mandala, S. Zainal, A. Nasien, D. Ngadi, M. A. Yahaya, C. QA Mathematics Pocket Switched Network (PSN) is a branch of Delay Tolerant Network (DTN) which is intended to work in a challenged network. Challenged network is network with lack of infrastructure such as disaster area. As such, the network has intermittent connectivity. PSN provides a new paradigm to distribute messages in the network by taking advantage of roaming nodes from one place to another. In this paper, network performances of eight PSN routing protocols are investigated namely, First Contact, Direct Delivery, Epidemic, PRotocol using History of Encounter and Transitivity (PRoPHET), Spray and Wait, Binary Spray and Wait, Fuzzy Spray, Adaptive Fuzzy Spray and Wait. The performance metrics are packet delivery ratio, overhead ratio and average latency. Opportunistic Network Environment (ONE) simulator is used to evaluate the network performance. Experiments show that Epidemic has the best performance in term of message delivery ratio, but it has the highest overhead ratio. Direct Delivery has the lowest overhead ratio (zero overhead ratio) and PRoPHET has the lowest latency average. Penerbit UTM Press 2016 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/74359/1/DeniYulianti2016_PerformanceComparisonofBaselineRouting.pdf Yulianti, D. and Mandala, S. and Zainal, A. and Nasien, D. and Ngadi, M. A. and Yahaya, C. (2016) Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network. Jurnal Teknologi, 78 (8-2). ISSN 0127-9696 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85031735799&partnerID=40&md5=93f543eb6b3dcdeaa934f0c2ecee4397
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic QA Mathematics
spellingShingle QA Mathematics
Yulianti, D.
Mandala, S.
Zainal, A.
Nasien, D.
Ngadi, M. A.
Yahaya, C.
Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network
description Pocket Switched Network (PSN) is a branch of Delay Tolerant Network (DTN) which is intended to work in a challenged network. Challenged network is network with lack of infrastructure such as disaster area. As such, the network has intermittent connectivity. PSN provides a new paradigm to distribute messages in the network by taking advantage of roaming nodes from one place to another. In this paper, network performances of eight PSN routing protocols are investigated namely, First Contact, Direct Delivery, Epidemic, PRotocol using History of Encounter and Transitivity (PRoPHET), Spray and Wait, Binary Spray and Wait, Fuzzy Spray, Adaptive Fuzzy Spray and Wait. The performance metrics are packet delivery ratio, overhead ratio and average latency. Opportunistic Network Environment (ONE) simulator is used to evaluate the network performance. Experiments show that Epidemic has the best performance in term of message delivery ratio, but it has the highest overhead ratio. Direct Delivery has the lowest overhead ratio (zero overhead ratio) and PRoPHET has the lowest latency average.
format Article
author Yulianti, D.
Mandala, S.
Zainal, A.
Nasien, D.
Ngadi, M. A.
Yahaya, C.
author_facet Yulianti, D.
Mandala, S.
Zainal, A.
Nasien, D.
Ngadi, M. A.
Yahaya, C.
author_sort Yulianti, D.
title Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network
title_short Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network
title_full Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network
title_fullStr Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network
title_full_unstemmed Performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network
title_sort performance comparison of baseline routing protocols in pocket switched network
publisher Penerbit UTM Press
publishDate 2016
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/74359/1/DeniYulianti2016_PerformanceComparisonofBaselineRouting.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/74359/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85031735799&partnerID=40&md5=93f543eb6b3dcdeaa934f0c2ecee4397
_version_ 1643656841349038080
score 13.211869