Differences in locomotor gross motor development level among grade 1 ballet dancers, students with and without co-curricula
Purpose: The study is a survey form ex post facto and the purpose of this study was to identify the level of locomotor skills among grade one ballet dancers, students with co-curriculum and students without co-curriculum. Methodology: A total of 90 students of the boy and girl who are around K...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Pitesti, Romania
2016
|
Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/55520/1/Differences%20in%20locomotor%20gross%20motor%20development%20level%20among%20grade%201%20ballet%20dancers%2C%20students%20with%20and%20without%20co-curricula.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/55520/ http://efsupit.ro/component/content/article/1/78 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose:
The study is a survey form ex post facto and the purpose of this study was to identify the level of locomotor skills among grade one ballet dancers, students with co-curriculum and students without co-curriculum.
Methodology:
A total of 90 students of the boy and girl who are around Klang and Seremban area have participated in this study. Gross Motor Development Tests (TGMD-2) by Ulrich (2000) was conducted to determine the level of locomotor skills of level one primary school students.
Statistical analysis Kruskal – Wallis test was used to analyse the mean score between the group of level one primary school students.
Result:
The results showed a group of ballet dancers grade 1 had the highest mean (M=3.13, SD=1.008), compared with a group of students with co-curricular activities M=2.000, SD=0.000) and a group of students without co-curricular activities (M=2.000, SD=0.000). However, significance differences in the scores also showed significant differences among the three groups with the estimated value of significance is 0.000.
Findings and discussion:
Studies show locomotor skills development of primary school students are still not developing well according to their chronological age. |
---|