Prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: A comparison between students and educators using a modified Delphi survey

Background Engaging students in the e-learning development process enhances the effective implementation of e-learning, however, students' priority on the topics for e-learning may differ from that of the educators. This study aims to compare the differences between the students and their educa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lim, Hooi Min, Ng, Chirk Jenn, Teo, Chin Hai, Lee, Ping Yein, Kassim, Puteri Shanaz Jahn, Nasharuddin, Nurul Amelina, Yong, Phelim Voon Chen, Sellappans, Renukha, Yap, Wei Hsum, Lee, Yew Kong, Abu Hassan, Zahiruddin Fitri, Krishnan, Kuhan, Ghazali, Sazlina Shariff, Idris, Faridah, Hassan, Nurhanim, Ayub, Enna, Konstantinidis, Stathis, Taylor, Michael, Poussa, Cherry, Karlgren, Klas, Stathakarou, Natalia, Mordt, Petter, Nilsen, Arne Thomas, Wharrad, Heather
Format: Article
Published: Public Library of Science 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/34631/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.34631
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.346312022-09-13T23:49:36Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/34631/ Prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: A comparison between students and educators using a modified Delphi survey Lim, Hooi Min Ng, Chirk Jenn Teo, Chin Hai Lee, Ping Yein Kassim, Puteri Shanaz Jahn Nasharuddin, Nurul Amelina Yong, Phelim Voon Chen Sellappans, Renukha Yap, Wei Hsum Lee, Yew Kong Abu Hassan, Zahiruddin Fitri Krishnan, Kuhan Ghazali, Sazlina Shariff Idris, Faridah Hassan, Nurhanim Ayub, Enna Konstantinidis, Stathis Taylor, Michael Poussa, Cherry Karlgren, Klas Stathakarou, Natalia Mordt, Petter Nilsen, Arne Thomas Wharrad, Heather Q Science (General) T Technology (General) Background Engaging students in the e-learning development process enhances the effective implementation of e-learning, however, students' priority on the topics for e-learning may differ from that of the educators. This study aims to compare the differences between the students and their educators in prioritising the topics in three healthcare curricula for reusable e-learning object (RLO) development. Method A modified Delphi study was conducted among students and educators from University Malaya (UM), Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) and Taylor's University (TU) on three undergraduate programmes. In Round 1, participants were asked to select the topics from the respective syllabi to be developed into RLOs. Priority ranking was determined by using frequencies and proportions. The first quartile of the prioritised topics was included in Round 2 survey, which the participants were asked to rate the level of priority of each topic using a 5-point Likert scale. The mean score of the topics was compared between students and educators. Result A total of 43 educators and 377 students participated in this study. For UM and TU Pharmacy, there was a mismatch in the prioritised topics between the students and educators. For UPM, both the educators and students have prioritised the same topics in both rounds. To harmonise the prioritisation of topics between students and educators for UM and TU Pharmacy, the topics with a higher mean score by both the students and educators were prioritised. Conclusion The mismatch in prioritised topics between students and educators uncovered factors that might influence the prioritisation process. This study highlighted the importance of conducting needs assessment at the beginning of eLearning resources development. Public Library of Science 2021-06-24 Article PeerReviewed Lim, Hooi Min and Ng, Chirk Jenn and Teo, Chin Hai and Lee, Ping Yein and Kassim, Puteri Shanaz Jahn and Nasharuddin, Nurul Amelina and Yong, Phelim Voon Chen and Sellappans, Renukha and Yap, Wei Hsum and Lee, Yew Kong and Abu Hassan, Zahiruddin Fitri and Krishnan, Kuhan and Ghazali, Sazlina Shariff and Idris, Faridah and Hassan, Nurhanim and Ayub, Enna and Konstantinidis, Stathis and Taylor, Michael and Poussa, Cherry and Karlgren, Klas and Stathakarou, Natalia and Mordt, Petter and Nilsen, Arne Thomas and Wharrad, Heather (2021) Prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: A comparison between students and educators using a modified Delphi survey. PLoS ONE, 16 (6). ISSN 1932-6203, DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253471 <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253471>. 10.1371/journal.pone.0253471
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic Q Science (General)
T Technology (General)
spellingShingle Q Science (General)
T Technology (General)
Lim, Hooi Min
Ng, Chirk Jenn
Teo, Chin Hai
Lee, Ping Yein
Kassim, Puteri Shanaz Jahn
Nasharuddin, Nurul Amelina
Yong, Phelim Voon Chen
Sellappans, Renukha
Yap, Wei Hsum
Lee, Yew Kong
Abu Hassan, Zahiruddin Fitri
Krishnan, Kuhan
Ghazali, Sazlina Shariff
Idris, Faridah
Hassan, Nurhanim
Ayub, Enna
Konstantinidis, Stathis
Taylor, Michael
Poussa, Cherry
Karlgren, Klas
Stathakarou, Natalia
Mordt, Petter
Nilsen, Arne Thomas
Wharrad, Heather
Prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: A comparison between students and educators using a modified Delphi survey
description Background Engaging students in the e-learning development process enhances the effective implementation of e-learning, however, students' priority on the topics for e-learning may differ from that of the educators. This study aims to compare the differences between the students and their educators in prioritising the topics in three healthcare curricula for reusable e-learning object (RLO) development. Method A modified Delphi study was conducted among students and educators from University Malaya (UM), Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) and Taylor's University (TU) on three undergraduate programmes. In Round 1, participants were asked to select the topics from the respective syllabi to be developed into RLOs. Priority ranking was determined by using frequencies and proportions. The first quartile of the prioritised topics was included in Round 2 survey, which the participants were asked to rate the level of priority of each topic using a 5-point Likert scale. The mean score of the topics was compared between students and educators. Result A total of 43 educators and 377 students participated in this study. For UM and TU Pharmacy, there was a mismatch in the prioritised topics between the students and educators. For UPM, both the educators and students have prioritised the same topics in both rounds. To harmonise the prioritisation of topics between students and educators for UM and TU Pharmacy, the topics with a higher mean score by both the students and educators were prioritised. Conclusion The mismatch in prioritised topics between students and educators uncovered factors that might influence the prioritisation process. This study highlighted the importance of conducting needs assessment at the beginning of eLearning resources development.
format Article
author Lim, Hooi Min
Ng, Chirk Jenn
Teo, Chin Hai
Lee, Ping Yein
Kassim, Puteri Shanaz Jahn
Nasharuddin, Nurul Amelina
Yong, Phelim Voon Chen
Sellappans, Renukha
Yap, Wei Hsum
Lee, Yew Kong
Abu Hassan, Zahiruddin Fitri
Krishnan, Kuhan
Ghazali, Sazlina Shariff
Idris, Faridah
Hassan, Nurhanim
Ayub, Enna
Konstantinidis, Stathis
Taylor, Michael
Poussa, Cherry
Karlgren, Klas
Stathakarou, Natalia
Mordt, Petter
Nilsen, Arne Thomas
Wharrad, Heather
author_facet Lim, Hooi Min
Ng, Chirk Jenn
Teo, Chin Hai
Lee, Ping Yein
Kassim, Puteri Shanaz Jahn
Nasharuddin, Nurul Amelina
Yong, Phelim Voon Chen
Sellappans, Renukha
Yap, Wei Hsum
Lee, Yew Kong
Abu Hassan, Zahiruddin Fitri
Krishnan, Kuhan
Ghazali, Sazlina Shariff
Idris, Faridah
Hassan, Nurhanim
Ayub, Enna
Konstantinidis, Stathis
Taylor, Michael
Poussa, Cherry
Karlgren, Klas
Stathakarou, Natalia
Mordt, Petter
Nilsen, Arne Thomas
Wharrad, Heather
author_sort Lim, Hooi Min
title Prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: A comparison between students and educators using a modified Delphi survey
title_short Prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: A comparison between students and educators using a modified Delphi survey
title_full Prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: A comparison between students and educators using a modified Delphi survey
title_fullStr Prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: A comparison between students and educators using a modified Delphi survey
title_full_unstemmed Prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: A comparison between students and educators using a modified Delphi survey
title_sort prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: a comparison between students and educators using a modified delphi survey
publisher Public Library of Science
publishDate 2021
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/34631/
_version_ 1744649190395346944
score 13.211869