Universality and normativity of the attachment theory in non-western psychiatric and non-psychiatric samples: multiple group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)

This study tests for the first time the validity of universality and normativity assumptions related to the attachment theory in a non-Western culture, using a novel design including psychiatric and non-psychiatric samples as part of a comprehensive exploratory and advanced confirmatory framework...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
Main Authors: Abdulhafeeth Alareqe, Naser, Roslan, Samsilah, Mohammed Taresh, Sahar, Nordin, Mohamad Sahari
格式: Article
語言:English
English
出版: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) 2021
主題:
在線閱讀:http://irep.iium.edu.my/92693/7/92693_Universality%20and%20normativity%20of%20the%20attachment%20theory_SCOPUS.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/92693/8/92693_Universality%20and%20normativity%20of%20the%20attachment%20theory.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/92693/
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5770/pdf
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115770
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
實物特徵
總結:This study tests for the first time the validity of universality and normativity assumptions related to the attachment theory in a non-Western culture, using a novel design including psychiatric and non-psychiatric samples as part of a comprehensive exploratory and advanced confirmatory framework. Three attachment assessments were distributed to 212 psychiatric outpatients and 300 non-psychiatric samples in Yemen. The results of the fourteen approaches of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) produce a similar result and assertion that the psychiatric outpatients tend to explore attachment outcomes based on multi-methods, while the non-psychiatric samples suggest an attachment orientation based on multi-traits (self–other). The multiple group-confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA) demonstrates that the multi-method model fits the psychiatric samples better than the non-psychiatric samples. Equally, the MG-CFA suggests that the multi-traits model also fits the psychiatric samples better than the non-psychiatric samples. Implications of the results are discussed.