Cover Image

Physical versus augmented reality model: Comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery

The research focuses on the comparison of students’ perception toward learning experience between the usage of physical models and Augmented Reality (AR) models of architectural heritage at Heritage Studies Gallery. Currently, the gallery has embedded Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) technologies as a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kassim, Mohd Hisyammudin, Abdullah, Fadzidah, Denan, Zuraini, Ahmad Arafat, Khandoker
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: American Scientific Publisher 2017
Subjects:
NA2000 Study and teaching. Research
NC Drawing Design Illustration
NC730 Technique
TH1000 Systems of building construction
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/56898/1/FADZIDAH%20HISYAM%20ASL%20COMPARE%20AR.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/56898/7/56898-Physical%20versus%20augmented%20reality%20model_SCOPUS.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/56898/
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/asp/asl/2017/00000023/00000002/art00045
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.iium.irep.56898
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.568982018-02-03T14:09:37Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/56898/ Physical versus augmented reality model: Comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery Kassim, Mohd Hisyammudin Abdullah, Fadzidah Denan, Zuraini Ahmad Arafat, Khandoker NA2000 Study and teaching. Research NC Drawing Design Illustration NC730 Technique TH1000 Systems of building construction The research focuses on the comparison of students’ perception toward learning experience between the usage of physical models and Augmented Reality (AR) models of architectural heritage at Heritage Studies Gallery. Currently, the gallery has embedded Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) technologies as an alternative in collecting, preserving and displaying the collection. It is anticipated that AR models is preferable as compared to physical models in the context of the gallery display for learning experience. However, architectural education still believed in physical models as a medium of communication that assist students’ learning experiences. In this research, the AR models are not going to replace the roles of physical models, but they are used to assist students’ learning by utilising 3D visualizing media especially for architectural heritage education. Thus, the objectives of this research are to highlight the role of both media in architectural heritage education and to compare the students’ perceptions of their learning experience between utilising physical models versus using AR models of Architectural Heritage. The research applied qualitative-quantitative mixed research approach, where the observation through video cameras and questionnaires are used to obtain primary data. The video observation and questionnaire on the students’ perception would be collected right after the students experience the learning process at the gallery. The reflection highlights the role of both media toward the students learning experience especially in architectural heritage education at the gallery. The research also looking forward on collaborative learning by combining both media which could be applied to other disciplines. American Scientific Publisher 2017-02 Article REM application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/56898/1/FADZIDAH%20HISYAM%20ASL%20COMPARE%20AR.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/56898/7/56898-Physical%20versus%20augmented%20reality%20model_SCOPUS.pdf Kassim, Mohd Hisyammudin and Abdullah, Fadzidah and Denan, Zuraini and Ahmad Arafat, Khandoker (2017) Physical versus augmented reality model: Comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery. Advanced Science Letters, 23 (2). pp. 890-893. ISSN 1936-6612 http://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/asp/asl/2017/00000023/00000002/art00045 10.1166/asl.2017.7549
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
English
topic NA2000 Study and teaching. Research
NC Drawing Design Illustration
NC730 Technique
TH1000 Systems of building construction
spellingShingle NA2000 Study and teaching. Research
NC Drawing Design Illustration
NC730 Technique
TH1000 Systems of building construction
Kassim, Mohd Hisyammudin
Abdullah, Fadzidah
Denan, Zuraini
Ahmad Arafat, Khandoker
Physical versus augmented reality model: Comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery
description The research focuses on the comparison of students’ perception toward learning experience between the usage of physical models and Augmented Reality (AR) models of architectural heritage at Heritage Studies Gallery. Currently, the gallery has embedded Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) technologies as an alternative in collecting, preserving and displaying the collection. It is anticipated that AR models is preferable as compared to physical models in the context of the gallery display for learning experience. However, architectural education still believed in physical models as a medium of communication that assist students’ learning experiences. In this research, the AR models are not going to replace the roles of physical models, but they are used to assist students’ learning by utilising 3D visualizing media especially for architectural heritage education. Thus, the objectives of this research are to highlight the role of both media in architectural heritage education and to compare the students’ perceptions of their learning experience between utilising physical models versus using AR models of Architectural Heritage. The research applied qualitative-quantitative mixed research approach, where the observation through video cameras and questionnaires are used to obtain primary data. The video observation and questionnaire on the students’ perception would be collected right after the students experience the learning process at the gallery. The reflection highlights the role of both media toward the students learning experience especially in architectural heritage education at the gallery. The research also looking forward on collaborative learning by combining both media which could be applied to other disciplines.
format Article
author Kassim, Mohd Hisyammudin
Abdullah, Fadzidah
Denan, Zuraini
Ahmad Arafat, Khandoker
author_facet Kassim, Mohd Hisyammudin
Abdullah, Fadzidah
Denan, Zuraini
Ahmad Arafat, Khandoker
author_sort Kassim, Mohd Hisyammudin
title Physical versus augmented reality model: Comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery
title_short Physical versus augmented reality model: Comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery
title_full Physical versus augmented reality model: Comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery
title_fullStr Physical versus augmented reality model: Comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery
title_full_unstemmed Physical versus augmented reality model: Comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery
title_sort physical versus augmented reality model: comparative study toward learning experiences at heritage studies gallery
publisher American Scientific Publisher
publishDate 2017
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/56898/1/FADZIDAH%20HISYAM%20ASL%20COMPARE%20AR.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/56898/7/56898-Physical%20versus%20augmented%20reality%20model_SCOPUS.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/56898/
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/asp/asl/2017/00000023/00000002/art00045
_version_ 1643615022366064640
score 13.211869

Similar Items