Cover Image

Rejection of divalent ions in commercial tubular membranes: Effect of feed concentration and anion type

Four commercial tubular membranes (AFC80, AFC30, PU608, and ES404) have been investigated in this study for their performance of binary metal ions rejection under different feed conditions. A range of salts (tin chloride, tin sulphate, calcium chloride, calcium sulphate) with divalent cations were c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qadir, D., Mukhtar, H.B., Keong, L.K.
Format: Article
Published: Chinese Institute of Environmental Engineering 2017
Online Access:http://scholars.utp.edu.my/id/eprint/19584/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85016336532&doi=10.1016%2fj.serj.2016.12.002&partnerID=40&md5=2be22e70ac5117e736469d64bdf9621b
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scholars.utp.edu.my:19584
record_format eprints
spelling oai:scholars.utp.edu.my:195842023-04-11T04:14:37Z http://scholars.utp.edu.my/id/eprint/19584/ Rejection of divalent ions in commercial tubular membranes: Effect of feed concentration and anion type Qadir, D. Mukhtar, H.B. Keong, L.K. Four commercial tubular membranes (AFC80, AFC30, PU608, and ES404) have been investigated in this study for their performance of binary metal ions rejection under different feed conditions. A range of salts (tin chloride, tin sulphate, calcium chloride, calcium sulphate) with divalent cations were chosen to assess the effects of different anions (chloride and sulphate) on performance of the membranes. All membranes were tested by varying the feed concentration (2500, 5000, 10,000 mg L−1) at fixed cross flow velocity of 1.5 LPM and feed pressure 1400 kPa. Observed retention (Robs) and permeate flux (Jv) were key parameters to evaluate the performance of studied tubular membranes. It was found that increase in concentration adversely affected the both evaluation parameters, i.e., permeate flux and rejection. Nevertheless, nanofiltration type tubular membranes (AFC80 and AFC30) showed higher rejection than their counterparts, i.e., ultrafiltration type tubular membranes (ES404, PU608) for all investigated salts. Maximum observed rejection for all salts was noted for AFC80 for all salts followed by AFC30, ES404 and PU608 tubular membranes. Furthermore, it is reveal that anion types (SO4 2−, Cl−) of these salts played a vital role in retention of these tubular membranes when the salts with same cations were used as feed solution. © 2016 Chinese Institute of Environmental Engineering, Taiwan Chinese Institute of Environmental Engineering 2017 Article PeerReviewed Qadir, D. and Mukhtar, H.B. and Keong, L.K. (2017) Rejection of divalent ions in commercial tubular membranes: Effect of feed concentration and anion type. Sustainable Environment Research, 27 (2). pp. 103-106. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85016336532&doi=10.1016%2fj.serj.2016.12.002&partnerID=40&md5=2be22e70ac5117e736469d64bdf9621b
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description Four commercial tubular membranes (AFC80, AFC30, PU608, and ES404) have been investigated in this study for their performance of binary metal ions rejection under different feed conditions. A range of salts (tin chloride, tin sulphate, calcium chloride, calcium sulphate) with divalent cations were chosen to assess the effects of different anions (chloride and sulphate) on performance of the membranes. All membranes were tested by varying the feed concentration (2500, 5000, 10,000 mg L−1) at fixed cross flow velocity of 1.5 LPM and feed pressure 1400 kPa. Observed retention (Robs) and permeate flux (Jv) were key parameters to evaluate the performance of studied tubular membranes. It was found that increase in concentration adversely affected the both evaluation parameters, i.e., permeate flux and rejection. Nevertheless, nanofiltration type tubular membranes (AFC80 and AFC30) showed higher rejection than their counterparts, i.e., ultrafiltration type tubular membranes (ES404, PU608) for all investigated salts. Maximum observed rejection for all salts was noted for AFC80 for all salts followed by AFC30, ES404 and PU608 tubular membranes. Furthermore, it is reveal that anion types (SO4 2−, Cl−) of these salts played a vital role in retention of these tubular membranes when the salts with same cations were used as feed solution. © 2016 Chinese Institute of Environmental Engineering, Taiwan
format Article
author Qadir, D.
Mukhtar, H.B.
Keong, L.K.
spellingShingle Qadir, D.
Mukhtar, H.B.
Keong, L.K.
Rejection of divalent ions in commercial tubular membranes: Effect of feed concentration and anion type
author_facet Qadir, D.
Mukhtar, H.B.
Keong, L.K.
author_sort Qadir, D.
title Rejection of divalent ions in commercial tubular membranes: Effect of feed concentration and anion type
title_short Rejection of divalent ions in commercial tubular membranes: Effect of feed concentration and anion type
title_full Rejection of divalent ions in commercial tubular membranes: Effect of feed concentration and anion type
title_fullStr Rejection of divalent ions in commercial tubular membranes: Effect of feed concentration and anion type
title_full_unstemmed Rejection of divalent ions in commercial tubular membranes: Effect of feed concentration and anion type
title_sort rejection of divalent ions in commercial tubular membranes: effect of feed concentration and anion type
publisher Chinese Institute of Environmental Engineering
publishDate 2017
url http://scholars.utp.edu.my/id/eprint/19584/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85016336532&doi=10.1016%2fj.serj.2016.12.002&partnerID=40&md5=2be22e70ac5117e736469d64bdf9621b
_version_ 1762964042372087808
score 13.211869

Similar Items