Quality research framework: Enumerative study versus analytic study from Deming’s perspective

Problem statement: The right research framework is the only way to lead us to become champions in our respective disciplines and certainly to be recognized as an excellent referral center of knowledge for the world. Deming, a well-known quality guru, has defined two research frameworks, namely enum...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kang, Eng Thye
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Science Publications 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repo.uum.edu.my/3036/1/ajebasp.2011.126.131%5B1%5D.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/3036/
http://www.thescipub.com/issue-ajeba/3/1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uum.repo.3036
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.30362011-05-15T01:20:57Z http://repo.uum.edu.my/3036/ Quality research framework: Enumerative study versus analytic study from Deming’s perspective Kang, Eng Thye T Technology (General) Problem statement: The right research framework is the only way to lead us to become champions in our respective disciplines and certainly to be recognized as an excellent referral center of knowledge for the world. Deming, a well-known quality guru, has defined two research frameworks, namely enumerative study and analytic study. They are totally different in their applications and implications. He criticizes analytic study as it is the most misguided and poorly taught research approach in most universities, as compared to enumerative study. Approach: Intensive literature reviews were conducted to obtain in-depth understanding concerning Deming’s teachings through books, websites and journals. Results: Enumerative study aims to describe the magnitude of the study problem with its possible correlated variable (s). The study objectives, its variables’ scope, hypothesis and research method are predetermined earlier. Common statistical tools in used are the t-test, chi-square, correlation and frequency. Outcome studies involve percentage prevalence data, new standard formula and linear modeling. The major pitfall of enumerative study is that its findings, recommendation and action for improvement could be wrongly interpreted, misleading and wrongly guided. It is because the statistically significant correlated variables do not truly support the cause to existing study problem. In analytic study, the main purpose is to answer the “why” question. It tries to identify the real variable(s) incur to the study problems. Statistical Process Control is the only statistical analytic tool in this particular research question framework. Conclusion: In summary, Deming’s emphasis is to focus on analytic study as it helps to generate new knowledge, rather than enumerative study. The latter is passive and does not help much either to prevent the problem encountered or to improve on the existing problematic situation. Science Publications 2011-01-07 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://repo.uum.edu.my/3036/1/ajebasp.2011.126.131%5B1%5D.pdf Kang, Eng Thye (2011) Quality research framework: Enumerative study versus analytic study from Deming’s perspective. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3 (1). pp. 126-131. ISSN 1945-5488 http://www.thescipub.com/issue-ajeba/3/1
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutionali Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic T Technology (General)
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
Kang, Eng Thye
Quality research framework: Enumerative study versus analytic study from Deming’s perspective
description Problem statement: The right research framework is the only way to lead us to become champions in our respective disciplines and certainly to be recognized as an excellent referral center of knowledge for the world. Deming, a well-known quality guru, has defined two research frameworks, namely enumerative study and analytic study. They are totally different in their applications and implications. He criticizes analytic study as it is the most misguided and poorly taught research approach in most universities, as compared to enumerative study. Approach: Intensive literature reviews were conducted to obtain in-depth understanding concerning Deming’s teachings through books, websites and journals. Results: Enumerative study aims to describe the magnitude of the study problem with its possible correlated variable (s). The study objectives, its variables’ scope, hypothesis and research method are predetermined earlier. Common statistical tools in used are the t-test, chi-square, correlation and frequency. Outcome studies involve percentage prevalence data, new standard formula and linear modeling. The major pitfall of enumerative study is that its findings, recommendation and action for improvement could be wrongly interpreted, misleading and wrongly guided. It is because the statistically significant correlated variables do not truly support the cause to existing study problem. In analytic study, the main purpose is to answer the “why” question. It tries to identify the real variable(s) incur to the study problems. Statistical Process Control is the only statistical analytic tool in this particular research question framework. Conclusion: In summary, Deming’s emphasis is to focus on analytic study as it helps to generate new knowledge, rather than enumerative study. The latter is passive and does not help much either to prevent the problem encountered or to improve on the existing problematic situation.
format Article
author Kang, Eng Thye
author_facet Kang, Eng Thye
author_sort Kang, Eng Thye
title Quality research framework: Enumerative study versus analytic study from Deming’s perspective
title_short Quality research framework: Enumerative study versus analytic study from Deming’s perspective
title_full Quality research framework: Enumerative study versus analytic study from Deming’s perspective
title_fullStr Quality research framework: Enumerative study versus analytic study from Deming’s perspective
title_full_unstemmed Quality research framework: Enumerative study versus analytic study from Deming’s perspective
title_sort quality research framework: enumerative study versus analytic study from deming’s perspective
publisher Science Publications
publishDate 2011
url http://repo.uum.edu.my/3036/1/ajebasp.2011.126.131%5B1%5D.pdf
http://repo.uum.edu.my/3036/
http://www.thescipub.com/issue-ajeba/3/1
_version_ 1644278396621946880
score 13.211869