Cover Image

Was Nigeria’s offering of Asylum status to President Charles Taylor of Liberia a diplomatic blunder? A foreign policy case review

This paper critically examines the appropriateness or otherwise of the granting of asylum status to former Liberian President, Charles Taylor by the Nigerian government on August 11, 2003. The paper argues that the granting of asylum status to Taylor was consistent with Nigeria’s Afrocentric foreign...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ngara, Christopher Ochanja
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Utara Malaysia Press 2022
Subjects:
JF Political institutions (General)
Online Access:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29014/1/JIS%2018%202022%2063-87.pdf
https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2022.18.3
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29014/
https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/jis/article/view/14444
https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2022.18.3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uum.repo.29014
record_format eprints
spelling my.uum.repo.290142023-02-12T08:35:27Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29014/ Was Nigeria’s offering of Asylum status to President Charles Taylor of Liberia a diplomatic blunder? A foreign policy case review Ngara, Christopher Ochanja JF Political institutions (General) This paper critically examines the appropriateness or otherwise of the granting of asylum status to former Liberian President, Charles Taylor by the Nigerian government on August 11, 2003. The paper argues that the granting of asylum status to Taylor was consistent with Nigeria’s Afrocentric foreign policy and traditional “big brother” role in Africa. The objective of the asylum was to end the 14-year-old-conflict and return peace and stability to Liberia. However, after the asylum was granted to Mr. Taylor, Nigeria came under serious international pressure from the United States (US) and Western allies to release Taylor for trial at the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL). Using desktop review, the findings showed that the asylum was an outcome of a multilateral agreement in which the United Nations (UN), African Union, Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the US, and the United Kingdom (UK) played active roles. The paper also establishes that granting asylum to Taylor was within Nigeria’s international obligation under Article 12(3) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights of 1981, for which Taylor qualified at the time of the asylum. Similarly, the Declaration of Territorial Asylum, 1967 gives asylum granting the state the powers to evaluate the grounds for granting such asylum. Thus, Nigeria’s asylum accorded to Taylor was the country’s prerogative and consistent with international law even though he was indicted for war crimes and crimes against humanity by the SCSL. Therefore, Nigeria’s action in granting asylum to Mr. Taylor neither violated any treaty to which Nigeria was a signatory at the time of granting the asylum nor amounted to a diplomatic blunder. Rather, Nigeria’s willingness to grant asylum to Taylor which subsequently led to the successful resolution of the Liberian crisis was widely commended in global diplomatic circles. Apart from applying indigenous diplomacy in conflict resolution, Nigeria’s rating as an effective regional power increased. To sustain the country’s pedigree of diplomatic excellence in resolving the Liberian crisis, Nigeria should rally ECOWAS countries to deepen economic integration, achieve self-reliance and make the sub-region less vulnerable to manipulation by Western powers. Universiti Utara Malaysia Press 2022 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29014/1/JIS%2018%202022%2063-87.pdf Ngara, Christopher Ochanja (2022) Was Nigeria’s offering of Asylum status to President Charles Taylor of Liberia a diplomatic blunder? A foreign policy case review. Journal of International Studies (JIS), 18. pp. 63-87. ISSN 1823-691X https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/jis/article/view/14444 https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2022.18.3 https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2022.18.3
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
building UUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Utara Malaysia
content_source UUM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://repo.uum.edu.my/
language English
topic JF Political institutions (General)
spellingShingle JF Political institutions (General)
Ngara, Christopher Ochanja
Was Nigeria’s offering of Asylum status to President Charles Taylor of Liberia a diplomatic blunder? A foreign policy case review
description This paper critically examines the appropriateness or otherwise of the granting of asylum status to former Liberian President, Charles Taylor by the Nigerian government on August 11, 2003. The paper argues that the granting of asylum status to Taylor was consistent with Nigeria’s Afrocentric foreign policy and traditional “big brother” role in Africa. The objective of the asylum was to end the 14-year-old-conflict and return peace and stability to Liberia. However, after the asylum was granted to Mr. Taylor, Nigeria came under serious international pressure from the United States (US) and Western allies to release Taylor for trial at the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL). Using desktop review, the findings showed that the asylum was an outcome of a multilateral agreement in which the United Nations (UN), African Union, Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the US, and the United Kingdom (UK) played active roles. The paper also establishes that granting asylum to Taylor was within Nigeria’s international obligation under Article 12(3) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights of 1981, for which Taylor qualified at the time of the asylum. Similarly, the Declaration of Territorial Asylum, 1967 gives asylum granting the state the powers to evaluate the grounds for granting such asylum. Thus, Nigeria’s asylum accorded to Taylor was the country’s prerogative and consistent with international law even though he was indicted for war crimes and crimes against humanity by the SCSL. Therefore, Nigeria’s action in granting asylum to Mr. Taylor neither violated any treaty to which Nigeria was a signatory at the time of granting the asylum nor amounted to a diplomatic blunder. Rather, Nigeria’s willingness to grant asylum to Taylor which subsequently led to the successful resolution of the Liberian crisis was widely commended in global diplomatic circles. Apart from applying indigenous diplomacy in conflict resolution, Nigeria’s rating as an effective regional power increased. To sustain the country’s pedigree of diplomatic excellence in resolving the Liberian crisis, Nigeria should rally ECOWAS countries to deepen economic integration, achieve self-reliance and make the sub-region less vulnerable to manipulation by Western powers.
format Article
author Ngara, Christopher Ochanja
author_facet Ngara, Christopher Ochanja
author_sort Ngara, Christopher Ochanja
title Was Nigeria’s offering of Asylum status to President Charles Taylor of Liberia a diplomatic blunder? A foreign policy case review
title_short Was Nigeria’s offering of Asylum status to President Charles Taylor of Liberia a diplomatic blunder? A foreign policy case review
title_full Was Nigeria’s offering of Asylum status to President Charles Taylor of Liberia a diplomatic blunder? A foreign policy case review
title_fullStr Was Nigeria’s offering of Asylum status to President Charles Taylor of Liberia a diplomatic blunder? A foreign policy case review
title_full_unstemmed Was Nigeria’s offering of Asylum status to President Charles Taylor of Liberia a diplomatic blunder? A foreign policy case review
title_sort was nigeria’s offering of asylum status to president charles taylor of liberia a diplomatic blunder? a foreign policy case review
publisher Universiti Utara Malaysia Press
publishDate 2022
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29014/1/JIS%2018%202022%2063-87.pdf
https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2022.18.3
https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29014/
https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/jis/article/view/14444
https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2022.18.3
_version_ 1758953040441769984
score 13.211869

Similar Items