Re-estimating the impact of liquidity on bank profitability in Nigeria
In respond to the heightened banking operational risk linked to the liquidity crunch, the Basel Committee for Bank Supervision has continued to advocate for banks holding a considerable liquid asset and also operating profitably. The dilemma thus, is in finding a balance between liquidity and pro...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://repo.uum.edu.my/26686/1/ZAWED%202019%20657%20665.pdf http://repo.uum.edu.my/26686/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In respond to the heightened banking operational risk linked to the liquidity crunch, the Basel
Committee for Bank Supervision has continued to advocate for banks holding a considerable
liquid asset and also operating profitably. The dilemma thus, is in finding a balance between
liquidity and profitability as they are generally specified to be inversely related, when banks’
liquidity increases profitability decreases and vice versa. Theoretically, the Liquidity Profitability Trade-Off theory proposes that banks cannot pursue the two objectives
simultaneously without trade-off hence the need for optimal regulation and supervision by the
monetary authority to maintain safety and soundness of the banking system. This paper
therefore re-assesses the trade-off between liquidity and profitability for Nigerian banks
drawing on new data available from the official sources. It founds an insignificant relationship
between liquidity and bank profitability. It also finds that real interest rate (first lag) is
significant and negatively related to return on assets (ROA) while real GDP grow rate has a
negative and insignificant relationship with ROA of banks. The puzzling result is an
indication that Nigerian banks continue to generate profits even when there is a slowdown in
domestic economy, and this may have something to with the banks’ business model and the
funding market environment. |
|---|