Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) for technical evaluation of tenderers: A review of methods employed
Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is an area that is often discussed in operations research (OR).It is able to handle problems involving multiple criteria, and produce meaningful and quality decision making, especially in selecting the best alternative.This paper is aimed at reviewing the applic...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Article |
| 語言: | English |
| 出版: |
Science & Technology Research Institute for Defence (STRIDE)
2015
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | http://repo.uum.edu.my/18599/1/DSTTB%208%201%202015%2090-102.pdf http://repo.uum.edu.my/18599/ http://www.stride.gov.my/v1/techbulletin/2015_vol_8_num_1.pdf |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
| id |
my.uum.repo.18599 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
eprints |
| spelling |
my.uum.repo.185992016-08-21T07:58:07Z http://repo.uum.edu.my/18599/ Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) for technical evaluation of tenderers: A review of methods employed Mohamed, Nor Hafizah Lamsali, Hendrik Sathyamoorthy, Dinesh QA Mathematics Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is an area that is often discussed in operations research (OR).It is able to handle problems involving multiple criteria, and produce meaningful and quality decision making, especially in selecting the best alternative.This paper is aimed at reviewing the applications of MCDM for technical evaluation of tenderers.It identifies the problems that often occur in technical evaluation of tenderers.The MCDM techniques that have been employed to address these problems are then discussed, along with their benefits and limitations.Based on the review conducted, it can be suggested that analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is the most practical MCDM method for technical evaluation of tenderers, as it provides a fair and open process of assessment by taking into consideration the evaluators involved to avoid the issue of bias, and can be carried out with simplicity and transparency.Nonetheless, studies on other MCDM methods should be further explored due to the limitations of AHP. Science & Technology Research Institute for Defence (STRIDE) 2015 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://repo.uum.edu.my/18599/1/DSTTB%208%201%202015%2090-102.pdf Mohamed, Nor Hafizah and Lamsali, Hendrik and Sathyamoorthy, Dinesh (2015) Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) for technical evaluation of tenderers: A review of methods employed. Defence S&T Technical Bulletin, 8 (1). pp. 90-102. ISSN 1985-6571 http://www.stride.gov.my/v1/techbulletin/2015_vol_8_num_1.pdf |
| institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
| building |
UUM Library |
| collection |
Institutional Repository |
| continent |
Asia |
| country |
Malaysia |
| content_provider |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
| content_source |
UUM Institutionali Repository |
| url_provider |
http://repo.uum.edu.my/ |
| language |
English |
| topic |
QA Mathematics |
| spellingShingle |
QA Mathematics Mohamed, Nor Hafizah Lamsali, Hendrik Sathyamoorthy, Dinesh Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) for technical evaluation of tenderers: A review of methods employed |
| description |
Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is an area that is often discussed in operations research (OR).It is able to handle problems involving multiple criteria, and produce meaningful and quality decision making, especially in selecting the best alternative.This paper is aimed at reviewing the applications of MCDM for technical evaluation of tenderers.It identifies the problems that often occur in technical evaluation of tenderers.The MCDM techniques that have been employed to address these problems are then discussed, along with their benefits and limitations.Based on the review conducted, it can be suggested that analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is the most practical MCDM method for technical evaluation of tenderers, as it provides a fair and open process of assessment by taking into consideration the evaluators involved to avoid the issue of bias, and can be carried out with simplicity and transparency.Nonetheless, studies on other MCDM methods should be further explored due to the limitations of AHP. |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Mohamed, Nor Hafizah Lamsali, Hendrik Sathyamoorthy, Dinesh |
| author_facet |
Mohamed, Nor Hafizah Lamsali, Hendrik Sathyamoorthy, Dinesh |
| author_sort |
Mohamed, Nor Hafizah |
| title |
Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) for technical evaluation of tenderers: A review of methods employed |
| title_short |
Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) for technical evaluation of tenderers: A review of methods employed |
| title_full |
Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) for technical evaluation of tenderers: A review of methods employed |
| title_fullStr |
Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) for technical evaluation of tenderers: A review of methods employed |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) for technical evaluation of tenderers: A review of methods employed |
| title_sort |
multi-criteria decision making (mcdm) for technical evaluation of tenderers: a review of methods employed |
| publisher |
Science & Technology Research Institute for Defence (STRIDE) |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| url |
http://repo.uum.edu.my/18599/1/DSTTB%208%201%202015%2090-102.pdf http://repo.uum.edu.my/18599/ http://www.stride.gov.my/v1/techbulletin/2015_vol_8_num_1.pdf |
| _version_ |
1644282490973585408 |
| score |
13.250246 |