Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Gaya Pembelajaran Dan Kesannya Terhadap Pencapaian Akademik
Attempts to broaden the conception of learning styles to represent more adequately individual differences in cognition are limited by a scarcity of relevant theories. This document reports on a study to determine if there is a pattern between specific learning styles and academic achievement. The le...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
1998
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://etd.uum.edu.my/758/1/TUMERAH_ROSMIN_-_fFaktor-faktor_yang_mempengaruhi_gaya_pembelajaran_dan_kesannya_terhadap_pencapaian_akademik.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/758/2/1.TUMERAH_ROSMIN_-_fFaktor-faktor_yang_mempengaruhi_gaya_pembelajaran_dan_kesannya_terhadap_pencapaian_akademik.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/758/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Attempts to broaden the conception of learning styles to represent more adequately individual differences in cognition are limited by a scarcity of relevant theories. This document reports on a study to determine if there is a pattern between specific learning styles and academic achievement. The learning styles inventory used for the study is based on “Grasha-Reichmann Student Learning
Styles” indicator preferences, i.e. independent, dependent, avoidance, collaborative, competitive and participant, each of which has distinctive and
characteristics that can be translated into behavior and perceptual preferences. Although six instructional preferences were assessed, findings were statistically
significant for only one. Learning style preferences were significantly influence by ethnicity. The finding also suggests that gender and age were negatively and
significantly related to the learning styles. It was found that there was no significant relationship between learning styles and student’s home background. Student learning styles also had no apparent influence on academic achievement, indicating a need for closer scrutiny beyond the scope of this study. |
|---|