Comparison of Predictive Models for Relative Permeability of CO2 in Matrimid-Carbon Molecular Sieve Mixed Matrix Membrane

Different well-known gas permeation theoretical models such as Maxwell model, Bruggeman model, Lewis-Nielson model, Pal model, Felske model and modified Felske model has been discussed for prediction of the relative permeability of CO2 in Matrimid® 5218-Carbon Molecular Sieve (CMS) Mixed Matrix Memb...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B, Shimekit, H., Mukhtar, S., Maitra
Format: Citation Index Journal
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4667/1/qredirect.php%3Fdoi%3Djas.2010.1204.1211%26linkid%3Dpdf
http://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2010.1204.1211
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4667/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utp.eprints.4667
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.46672017-01-19T08:24:35Z Comparison of Predictive Models for Relative Permeability of CO2 in Matrimid-Carbon Molecular Sieve Mixed Matrix Membrane B, Shimekit H., Mukhtar S., Maitra Q Science (General) Different well-known gas permeation theoretical models such as Maxwell model, Bruggeman model, Lewis-Nielson model, Pal model, Felske model and modified Felske model has been discussed for prediction of the relative permeability of CO2 in Matrimid® 5218-Carbon Molecular Sieve (CMS) Mixed Matrix Membranes (MMMs). For evaluation of the theoretical models, experimental data of relative permeability for CO2 in Matrimid® 5218-Carbon Molecular Sieve (CMS) mixed matrix membrane were compared with the prediction of the theoretical models for the relative permeability of CO2 in ideal and rigidified interfacial morphology of the mixed matrix membrane. Comparison of those models was carried out based on the widely used model validation criteria including absolute average relative error percent and standard deviation. For the models evaluated under ideal morphology, the results showed a decrease in the absolute average relative error percent and standard deviation in the following order: Pal model > Lewis-Nielsen model > Maxwell model > Bruggeman model. For other models evaluated considering the presence of rigidified interfacial morphology, the absolute average relative error percent and standard deviation showed a decrease in the order, Felske model > modified Felske model. Hence, the modified Felske model was found to be in a better agreement with experimental data for prediction of relative permeability CO2 in Matrimid® 5218-CMS mixed matrix membrane. 2010 Citation Index Journal PeerReviewed application/pdf http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4667/1/qredirect.php%3Fdoi%3Djas.2010.1204.1211%26linkid%3Dpdf http://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2010.1204.1211 B, Shimekit and H., Mukhtar and S., Maitra (2010) Comparison of Predictive Models for Relative Permeability of CO2 in Matrimid-Carbon Molecular Sieve Mixed Matrix Membrane. [Citation Index Journal] http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4667/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
topic Q Science (General)
spellingShingle Q Science (General)
B, Shimekit
H., Mukhtar
S., Maitra
Comparison of Predictive Models for Relative Permeability of CO2 in Matrimid-Carbon Molecular Sieve Mixed Matrix Membrane
description Different well-known gas permeation theoretical models such as Maxwell model, Bruggeman model, Lewis-Nielson model, Pal model, Felske model and modified Felske model has been discussed for prediction of the relative permeability of CO2 in Matrimid® 5218-Carbon Molecular Sieve (CMS) Mixed Matrix Membranes (MMMs). For evaluation of the theoretical models, experimental data of relative permeability for CO2 in Matrimid® 5218-Carbon Molecular Sieve (CMS) mixed matrix membrane were compared with the prediction of the theoretical models for the relative permeability of CO2 in ideal and rigidified interfacial morphology of the mixed matrix membrane. Comparison of those models was carried out based on the widely used model validation criteria including absolute average relative error percent and standard deviation. For the models evaluated under ideal morphology, the results showed a decrease in the absolute average relative error percent and standard deviation in the following order: Pal model > Lewis-Nielsen model > Maxwell model > Bruggeman model. For other models evaluated considering the presence of rigidified interfacial morphology, the absolute average relative error percent and standard deviation showed a decrease in the order, Felske model > modified Felske model. Hence, the modified Felske model was found to be in a better agreement with experimental data for prediction of relative permeability CO2 in Matrimid® 5218-CMS mixed matrix membrane.
format Citation Index Journal
author B, Shimekit
H., Mukhtar
S., Maitra
author_facet B, Shimekit
H., Mukhtar
S., Maitra
author_sort B, Shimekit
title Comparison of Predictive Models for Relative Permeability of CO2 in Matrimid-Carbon Molecular Sieve Mixed Matrix Membrane
title_short Comparison of Predictive Models for Relative Permeability of CO2 in Matrimid-Carbon Molecular Sieve Mixed Matrix Membrane
title_full Comparison of Predictive Models for Relative Permeability of CO2 in Matrimid-Carbon Molecular Sieve Mixed Matrix Membrane
title_fullStr Comparison of Predictive Models for Relative Permeability of CO2 in Matrimid-Carbon Molecular Sieve Mixed Matrix Membrane
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Predictive Models for Relative Permeability of CO2 in Matrimid-Carbon Molecular Sieve Mixed Matrix Membrane
title_sort comparison of predictive models for relative permeability of co2 in matrimid-carbon molecular sieve mixed matrix membrane
publishDate 2010
url http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4667/1/qredirect.php%3Fdoi%3Djas.2010.1204.1211%26linkid%3Dpdf
http://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2010.1204.1211
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4667/
_version_ 1738655361058996224
score 13.211869