COMPARISON OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY TOOLS CONSIDERING REBAR PROGRESS RECOGNITION
Construction progress monitoring is an important process throughout the project timeline towards its successful completion. Among imaging techniques, photogrammetry is considered as economical and effective method. However, few studies can be found on construction progress monitoring via photogramme...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | ["eprint_typename_conference\_item" not defined] |
Published: |
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
2022
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85132039227&doi=10.5194%2fisprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-141-2022&partnerID=40&md5=763ebd0fe17e089db617ca82d9a1fb08 http://eprints.utp.edu.my/33679/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.utp.eprints.33679 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utp.eprints.336792022-09-12T04:13:18Z COMPARISON OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY TOOLS CONSIDERING REBAR PROGRESS RECOGNITION Qureshi, A.H. Alaloul, W.S. Murtiyoso, A. Saad, S. Manzoor, B. Construction progress monitoring is an important process throughout the project timeline towards its successful completion. Among imaging techniques, photogrammetry is considered as economical and effective method. However, few studies can be found on construction progress monitoring via photogrammetry; thus, not much guideline is available for this domain. This study evaluated the photogrammetry tools for the progress assessment of the rebar grid framework. Photogrammetry tools were evaluated and analysed following defined criteria, and Agisoft Metashape, and 3DF Zephyr were identified as better options. This study aims to provide a guideline to construction industry professionals and stakeholders towards the adoption of photogrammetric progress assessment for construction activities. © 2022. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives. All rights reserved. International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2022 ["eprint_typename_conference\_item" not defined] NonPeerReviewed https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85132039227&doi=10.5194%2fisprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-141-2022&partnerID=40&md5=763ebd0fe17e089db617ca82d9a1fb08 Qureshi, A.H. and Alaloul, W.S. and Murtiyoso, A. and Saad, S. and Manzoor, B. (2022) COMPARISON OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY TOOLS CONSIDERING REBAR PROGRESS RECOGNITION. [["eprint_typename_conference\_item" not defined]] http://eprints.utp.edu.my/33679/ |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Petronas |
building |
UTP Resource Centre |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Petronas |
content_source |
UTP Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/ |
description |
Construction progress monitoring is an important process throughout the project timeline towards its successful completion. Among imaging techniques, photogrammetry is considered as economical and effective method. However, few studies can be found on construction progress monitoring via photogrammetry; thus, not much guideline is available for this domain. This study evaluated the photogrammetry tools for the progress assessment of the rebar grid framework. Photogrammetry tools were evaluated and analysed following defined criteria, and Agisoft Metashape, and 3DF Zephyr were identified as better options. This study aims to provide a guideline to construction industry professionals and stakeholders towards the adoption of photogrammetric progress assessment for construction activities. © 2022. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives. All rights reserved. |
format |
["eprint_typename_conference\_item" not defined] |
author |
Qureshi, A.H. Alaloul, W.S. Murtiyoso, A. Saad, S. Manzoor, B. |
spellingShingle |
Qureshi, A.H. Alaloul, W.S. Murtiyoso, A. Saad, S. Manzoor, B. COMPARISON OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY TOOLS CONSIDERING REBAR PROGRESS RECOGNITION |
author_facet |
Qureshi, A.H. Alaloul, W.S. Murtiyoso, A. Saad, S. Manzoor, B. |
author_sort |
Qureshi, A.H. |
title |
COMPARISON OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY TOOLS CONSIDERING REBAR PROGRESS RECOGNITION |
title_short |
COMPARISON OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY TOOLS CONSIDERING REBAR PROGRESS RECOGNITION |
title_full |
COMPARISON OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY TOOLS CONSIDERING REBAR PROGRESS RECOGNITION |
title_fullStr |
COMPARISON OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY TOOLS CONSIDERING REBAR PROGRESS RECOGNITION |
title_full_unstemmed |
COMPARISON OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY TOOLS CONSIDERING REBAR PROGRESS RECOGNITION |
title_sort |
comparison of photogrammetry tools considering rebar progress recognition |
publisher |
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85132039227&doi=10.5194%2fisprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-141-2022&partnerID=40&md5=763ebd0fe17e089db617ca82d9a1fb08 http://eprints.utp.edu.my/33679/ |
_version_ |
1744356201569714176 |
score |
13.211869 |