REGULATIONS FOR EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENT PROJECTS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR: BRIEF OVERVIEW AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

The policy of decarbonization and eco-modernization of the energy industry adopted by many countries implies a serious selection of investment projects primarily on the environmental pillar: projects aimed at reducing the negative impact on the environment or projects whose environmental damage from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karaeva, A., Magaril, E., Al-Kayiem, H.H.
Format: Article
Published: WITPress 2022
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85134620074&doi=10.2495%2fEPM220041&partnerID=40&md5=ac8b3ab0325b3ec5ddf07d560758b26a
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/33554/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utp.eprints.33554
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.335542022-09-07T07:56:43Z REGULATIONS FOR EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENT PROJECTS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR: BRIEF OVERVIEW AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Karaeva, A. Magaril, E. Al-Kayiem, H.H. The policy of decarbonization and eco-modernization of the energy industry adopted by many countries implies a serious selection of investment projects primarily on the environmental pillar: projects aimed at reducing the negative impact on the environment or projects whose environmental damage from the implementation might be minimal, become priority. Therefore, the environmental impact assessment of investment projects became mandatory in the efficiency assessment process. Nowadays, there is no generally acclaimed methodology in the world for assessing the environmental and economic efficiency of investment projects: each country may have and apply its own requirements and methods or use recommendations developed and prepared by the international organizations. To ensure high efficiency of environmental and economic assessment, numerous normative tools, including recommendations and/or requirements for their implementation, are recommended that may vary significantly in different countries. The present study aims on comparative analysis of normative documents adopted in Russia, the USA and the EU to assess the environmental and economic efficiency of investment projects. In addition, the results of the analysis will help to identify the key differences in regulations and the main problems and difficulties of conducting an environmental and economic assessment of investment projects. Finally, this may enable further assessment of the possibilities of creating a unified global approach. © 2022 WITPress. All rights reserved. WITPress 2022 Article NonPeerReviewed https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85134620074&doi=10.2495%2fEPM220041&partnerID=40&md5=ac8b3ab0325b3ec5ddf07d560758b26a Karaeva, A. and Magaril, E. and Al-Kayiem, H.H. (2022) REGULATIONS FOR EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENT PROJECTS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR: BRIEF OVERVIEW AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 255 . pp. 35-47. http://eprints.utp.edu.my/33554/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description The policy of decarbonization and eco-modernization of the energy industry adopted by many countries implies a serious selection of investment projects primarily on the environmental pillar: projects aimed at reducing the negative impact on the environment or projects whose environmental damage from the implementation might be minimal, become priority. Therefore, the environmental impact assessment of investment projects became mandatory in the efficiency assessment process. Nowadays, there is no generally acclaimed methodology in the world for assessing the environmental and economic efficiency of investment projects: each country may have and apply its own requirements and methods or use recommendations developed and prepared by the international organizations. To ensure high efficiency of environmental and economic assessment, numerous normative tools, including recommendations and/or requirements for their implementation, are recommended that may vary significantly in different countries. The present study aims on comparative analysis of normative documents adopted in Russia, the USA and the EU to assess the environmental and economic efficiency of investment projects. In addition, the results of the analysis will help to identify the key differences in regulations and the main problems and difficulties of conducting an environmental and economic assessment of investment projects. Finally, this may enable further assessment of the possibilities of creating a unified global approach. © 2022 WITPress. All rights reserved.
format Article
author Karaeva, A.
Magaril, E.
Al-Kayiem, H.H.
spellingShingle Karaeva, A.
Magaril, E.
Al-Kayiem, H.H.
REGULATIONS FOR EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENT PROJECTS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR: BRIEF OVERVIEW AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
author_facet Karaeva, A.
Magaril, E.
Al-Kayiem, H.H.
author_sort Karaeva, A.
title REGULATIONS FOR EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENT PROJECTS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR: BRIEF OVERVIEW AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_short REGULATIONS FOR EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENT PROJECTS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR: BRIEF OVERVIEW AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_full REGULATIONS FOR EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENT PROJECTS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR: BRIEF OVERVIEW AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_fullStr REGULATIONS FOR EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENT PROJECTS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR: BRIEF OVERVIEW AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_full_unstemmed REGULATIONS FOR EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENT PROJECTS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR: BRIEF OVERVIEW AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_sort regulations for efficiency assessment of investment projects in the energy sector: brief overview and comparative analysis
publisher WITPress
publishDate 2022
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85134620074&doi=10.2495%2fEPM220041&partnerID=40&md5=ac8b3ab0325b3ec5ddf07d560758b26a
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/33554/
_version_ 1744356184554471424
score 13.211869