Occupational health and safety practice in infrastructure projects

Objectives. This research intends to investigate the responsibilities of the parties engaged in the implementation phase of the infrastructure projects in occupational health and safety, i.e., the consultant and contractor. Methods. A questionnaire was developed through the selection and modificatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alhammadi, S.A., Tayeh, B.A., Alaloul, W.S., Jouda, A.F.
Format: Article
Published: Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2021
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85122146793&doi=10.1080%2f10803548.2021.2013034&partnerID=40&md5=04d644185892564a3f16b282559e5211
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/29322/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utp.eprints.29322
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.293222022-03-25T01:34:00Z Occupational health and safety practice in infrastructure projects Alhammadi, S.A. Tayeh, B.A. Alaloul, W.S. Jouda, A.F. Objectives. This research intends to investigate the responsibilities of the parties engaged in the implementation phase of the infrastructure projects in occupational health and safety, i.e., the consultant and contractor. Methods. A questionnaire was developed through the selection and modification of the responsibilities from the literature review. Results. The statistical analysis results show that the consultants and contractors both ranked the item �The owner requires the contractor to implement the occupational safety standards within the bid� first in the owner responsibilities, having 0.67 relative importance index (RII). In the responsibilities of the consultant, the first ranked item was �The consultant has a role in adopting occupational safety plans and contingency plans�, having 0.66 RII. In the responsibilities of the contractor, the first ranked item was �The contractor shall provide the insurance cover for all project crews�, having 0.71 RII. In the responsibilities of the workers, the first ranked item was �Workers know the handling of tools and equipment within the project�, having 0.59 RII. Conclusion. Overall, there was general agreement between consultants and contractors to classify and arrange items because both face the same conditions and have the same working environment. © 2021 Central Institute for Labour Protection�National Research Institute (CIOP-PIB). Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2021 Article NonPeerReviewed https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85122146793&doi=10.1080%2f10803548.2021.2013034&partnerID=40&md5=04d644185892564a3f16b282559e5211 Alhammadi, S.A. and Tayeh, B.A. and Alaloul, W.S. and Jouda, A.F. (2021) Occupational health and safety practice in infrastructure projects. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics . http://eprints.utp.edu.my/29322/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description Objectives. This research intends to investigate the responsibilities of the parties engaged in the implementation phase of the infrastructure projects in occupational health and safety, i.e., the consultant and contractor. Methods. A questionnaire was developed through the selection and modification of the responsibilities from the literature review. Results. The statistical analysis results show that the consultants and contractors both ranked the item �The owner requires the contractor to implement the occupational safety standards within the bid� first in the owner responsibilities, having 0.67 relative importance index (RII). In the responsibilities of the consultant, the first ranked item was �The consultant has a role in adopting occupational safety plans and contingency plans�, having 0.66 RII. In the responsibilities of the contractor, the first ranked item was �The contractor shall provide the insurance cover for all project crews�, having 0.71 RII. In the responsibilities of the workers, the first ranked item was �Workers know the handling of tools and equipment within the project�, having 0.59 RII. Conclusion. Overall, there was general agreement between consultants and contractors to classify and arrange items because both face the same conditions and have the same working environment. © 2021 Central Institute for Labour Protection�National Research Institute (CIOP-PIB).
format Article
author Alhammadi, S.A.
Tayeh, B.A.
Alaloul, W.S.
Jouda, A.F.
spellingShingle Alhammadi, S.A.
Tayeh, B.A.
Alaloul, W.S.
Jouda, A.F.
Occupational health and safety practice in infrastructure projects
author_facet Alhammadi, S.A.
Tayeh, B.A.
Alaloul, W.S.
Jouda, A.F.
author_sort Alhammadi, S.A.
title Occupational health and safety practice in infrastructure projects
title_short Occupational health and safety practice in infrastructure projects
title_full Occupational health and safety practice in infrastructure projects
title_fullStr Occupational health and safety practice in infrastructure projects
title_full_unstemmed Occupational health and safety practice in infrastructure projects
title_sort occupational health and safety practice in infrastructure projects
publisher Taylor and Francis Ltd.
publishDate 2021
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85122146793&doi=10.1080%2f10803548.2021.2013034&partnerID=40&md5=04d644185892564a3f16b282559e5211
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/29322/
_version_ 1738656949428289536
score 13.211869