Potable water production using two solar stills having different cover materials and fabrication costs

Solar stills are very cost-effective technologies used in producing potable water. This work aims to investigate the productivity of two passive double sloped solar stills fabricated with different cover materials with similar shapes; polythene film (PSS) and glass (GSS). The first solar still was m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Riahi, A., Wan Yusof, K., Isa, M.H., Singh Mahinder Singh, B., Mustaffa, Z., Ahsan, A., Ul Mustafa, M.R., Sapari, N., Zahari, N.A.M.
Format: Article
Published: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85026446730&doi=10.1002%2fep.12718&partnerID=40&md5=03d338d7cbe33c7c8990e96e519ed9c4
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/21339/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utp.eprints.21339
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.213392018-09-25T06:37:53Z Potable water production using two solar stills having different cover materials and fabrication costs Riahi, A. Wan Yusof, K. Isa, M.H. Singh Mahinder Singh, B. Mustaffa, Z. Ahsan, A. Ul Mustafa, M.R. Sapari, N. Zahari, N.A.M. Solar stills are very cost-effective technologies used in producing potable water. This work aims to investigate the productivity of two passive double sloped solar stills fabricated with different cover materials with similar shapes; polythene film (PSS) and glass (GSS). The first solar still was made of a transparent polythene film, PVC pipes and a black painted stainless steel trough as cover, frame and basin, respectively. The second one was fabricated using glass as cover, with similar basin material. Experimental outputs indicated that GSS had 1�5 higher yield than PSS throughout the experiment. The fabrication cost of PSS was 5 times less than the cost of the GSS. The thermal energy efficiencies of PSS and GSS were obtained as 34.05 and 35.50, respectively. A mathematical model for each solar still was developed using the relationships of heat and mass transfer and their calculated and experimental productivities were in good agreement. Water quality parameters tested showed that water produced from both solar stills met the WHO standards for drinking purposes. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 37: 584�596, 2018. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018 Article NonPeerReviewed https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85026446730&doi=10.1002%2fep.12718&partnerID=40&md5=03d338d7cbe33c7c8990e96e519ed9c4 Riahi, A. and Wan Yusof, K. and Isa, M.H. and Singh Mahinder Singh, B. and Mustaffa, Z. and Ahsan, A. and Ul Mustafa, M.R. and Sapari, N. and Zahari, N.A.M. (2018) Potable water production using two solar stills having different cover materials and fabrication costs. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy, 37 (1). pp. 584-596. http://eprints.utp.edu.my/21339/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description Solar stills are very cost-effective technologies used in producing potable water. This work aims to investigate the productivity of two passive double sloped solar stills fabricated with different cover materials with similar shapes; polythene film (PSS) and glass (GSS). The first solar still was made of a transparent polythene film, PVC pipes and a black painted stainless steel trough as cover, frame and basin, respectively. The second one was fabricated using glass as cover, with similar basin material. Experimental outputs indicated that GSS had 1�5 higher yield than PSS throughout the experiment. The fabrication cost of PSS was 5 times less than the cost of the GSS. The thermal energy efficiencies of PSS and GSS were obtained as 34.05 and 35.50, respectively. A mathematical model for each solar still was developed using the relationships of heat and mass transfer and their calculated and experimental productivities were in good agreement. Water quality parameters tested showed that water produced from both solar stills met the WHO standards for drinking purposes. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 37: 584�596, 2018. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog.
format Article
author Riahi, A.
Wan Yusof, K.
Isa, M.H.
Singh Mahinder Singh, B.
Mustaffa, Z.
Ahsan, A.
Ul Mustafa, M.R.
Sapari, N.
Zahari, N.A.M.
spellingShingle Riahi, A.
Wan Yusof, K.
Isa, M.H.
Singh Mahinder Singh, B.
Mustaffa, Z.
Ahsan, A.
Ul Mustafa, M.R.
Sapari, N.
Zahari, N.A.M.
Potable water production using two solar stills having different cover materials and fabrication costs
author_facet Riahi, A.
Wan Yusof, K.
Isa, M.H.
Singh Mahinder Singh, B.
Mustaffa, Z.
Ahsan, A.
Ul Mustafa, M.R.
Sapari, N.
Zahari, N.A.M.
author_sort Riahi, A.
title Potable water production using two solar stills having different cover materials and fabrication costs
title_short Potable water production using two solar stills having different cover materials and fabrication costs
title_full Potable water production using two solar stills having different cover materials and fabrication costs
title_fullStr Potable water production using two solar stills having different cover materials and fabrication costs
title_full_unstemmed Potable water production using two solar stills having different cover materials and fabrication costs
title_sort potable water production using two solar stills having different cover materials and fabrication costs
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
publishDate 2018
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85026446730&doi=10.1002%2fep.12718&partnerID=40&md5=03d338d7cbe33c7c8990e96e519ed9c4
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/21339/
_version_ 1738656275413073920
score 13.211869