Integrating Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Model for Selection of Centralized Chilled Water Generation - Review Paper

This paper presents a review of literature relating to Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) in Gas District Cooling plant. The gas district cooling plant uses either vapour compression process or absorption process for the chilled water generation. Both processes have impacts on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akbar, A., Mokhtar, A.A.B.
Format: Article
Published: EDP Sciences 2017
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85033222607&doi=10.1051%2fmatecconf%2f201713104006&partnerID=40&md5=d77c9a8c66d5a1e32682ab32e2236b04
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/19947/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utp.eprints.19947
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.199472018-04-22T14:26:27Z Integrating Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Model for Selection of Centralized Chilled Water Generation - Review Paper Akbar, A. Mokhtar, A.A.B. This paper presents a review of literature relating to Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) in Gas District Cooling plant. The gas district cooling plant uses either vapour compression process or absorption process for the chilled water generation. Both processes have impacts on the economic aspects as well as the contribution to CO2 emissions; thus, integration of the cost and environmental analysis of both processes are necessary. An extensive body of literature exists on both subjects, however, there is very limited number of available literature on the integration of LCC and LCA. The purpose of this review is to find the most suitable optimization model which can integrate the LCC and LCA to provide the best decision in choosing the most cost-effective and environment-friendly system. This review assesses the literature from thirty-four journals, research papers, and case reports from the year 1995 to 2017. The result of this review shows that the goal programming methodology is the appropriate method for integrating LCC and LCA because it provides the optimal decision in choosing the most cost-effective, environment-friendly system for the chilled water generation. © The authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017. EDP Sciences 2017 Article PeerReviewed https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85033222607&doi=10.1051%2fmatecconf%2f201713104006&partnerID=40&md5=d77c9a8c66d5a1e32682ab32e2236b04 Akbar, A. and Mokhtar, A.A.B. (2017) Integrating Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Model for Selection of Centralized Chilled Water Generation - Review Paper. MATEC Web of Conferences, 131 . http://eprints.utp.edu.my/19947/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description This paper presents a review of literature relating to Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) in Gas District Cooling plant. The gas district cooling plant uses either vapour compression process or absorption process for the chilled water generation. Both processes have impacts on the economic aspects as well as the contribution to CO2 emissions; thus, integration of the cost and environmental analysis of both processes are necessary. An extensive body of literature exists on both subjects, however, there is very limited number of available literature on the integration of LCC and LCA. The purpose of this review is to find the most suitable optimization model which can integrate the LCC and LCA to provide the best decision in choosing the most cost-effective and environment-friendly system. This review assesses the literature from thirty-four journals, research papers, and case reports from the year 1995 to 2017. The result of this review shows that the goal programming methodology is the appropriate method for integrating LCC and LCA because it provides the optimal decision in choosing the most cost-effective, environment-friendly system for the chilled water generation. © The authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017.
format Article
author Akbar, A.
Mokhtar, A.A.B.
spellingShingle Akbar, A.
Mokhtar, A.A.B.
Integrating Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Model for Selection of Centralized Chilled Water Generation - Review Paper
author_facet Akbar, A.
Mokhtar, A.A.B.
author_sort Akbar, A.
title Integrating Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Model for Selection of Centralized Chilled Water Generation - Review Paper
title_short Integrating Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Model for Selection of Centralized Chilled Water Generation - Review Paper
title_full Integrating Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Model for Selection of Centralized Chilled Water Generation - Review Paper
title_fullStr Integrating Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Model for Selection of Centralized Chilled Water Generation - Review Paper
title_full_unstemmed Integrating Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Model for Selection of Centralized Chilled Water Generation - Review Paper
title_sort integrating life cycle costing (lcc) and life cycle assessment (lca) model for selection of centralized chilled water generation - review paper
publisher EDP Sciences
publishDate 2017
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85033222607&doi=10.1051%2fmatecconf%2f201713104006&partnerID=40&md5=d77c9a8c66d5a1e32682ab32e2236b04
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/19947/
_version_ 1738656141949272064
score 13.211869