Cover Image

Impact of new foam surfactant blend with water alternating gas injection on residual oil recovery

Enhanced oil recovery methods are the future of maximizing oil recoveries. Any incremental oil recovery can support the world economy by producing more oil at a minimum price. The surfactants are the major constituent of the injection fluids for EOR applications. Addition of foam-generated surfactan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Memon, M.K., Elraies, K.A., Al-Mossawy, M.I.
Format: Article
Published: Springer Verlag 2017
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85027842835&doi=10.1007%2fs13202-016-0303-1&partnerID=40&md5=8b6abe36a7e487bcae012dd7fc02a58d
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/19367/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utp.eprints.19367
record_format eprints
spelling my.utp.eprints.193672018-04-20T00:34:01Z Impact of new foam surfactant blend with water alternating gas injection on residual oil recovery Memon, M.K. Elraies, K.A. Al-Mossawy, M.I. Enhanced oil recovery methods are the future of maximizing oil recoveries. Any incremental oil recovery can support the world economy by producing more oil at a minimum price. The surfactants are the major constituent of the injection fluids for EOR applications. Addition of foam-generated surfactants in water alternating gas injection is one of the potential solutions for reducing the gas mobility and improving sweep efficiency, but the major challenge of surfactants used with water alternating gas injection is its stability in presence of formation water and crude oil at reservoir conditions. The objective of this study is to investigate the stable surfactant as a foaming agent to improve the efficiency of residual oil and reduce the gas mobility. To achieve this main objective, individual and new surfactant blended formulations were evaluated with injection water and crude oil in the porous media at 96 °C and 1400 psi. Experimental result showed that generated foam in presence of crude oil has reduced gas mobility which provides good indication of CO2 mobility control and improves sweep efficiency. Oil recovery based on original oil-in-place by surfactant blend of 0.6 wt AOS + 0.6 wt TX 100, 0.6 wt AOS + 0.6 wt LMDO and individual surfactant of 0.6 wt AOS were recorded as 91.9, 83.7 and 72.66, respectively. Foam stability in presence of crude oil, reduction in gas mobility and increase in oil recovery indicated that these surfactant blends are good foaming agents as compared to individual surfactant in enhanced oil recovery applications. © 2016, The Author(s). Springer Verlag 2017 Article PeerReviewed https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85027842835&doi=10.1007%2fs13202-016-0303-1&partnerID=40&md5=8b6abe36a7e487bcae012dd7fc02a58d Memon, M.K. and Elraies, K.A. and Al-Mossawy, M.I. (2017) Impact of new foam surfactant blend with water alternating gas injection on residual oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 7 (3). pp. 843-851. http://eprints.utp.edu.my/19367/
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description Enhanced oil recovery methods are the future of maximizing oil recoveries. Any incremental oil recovery can support the world economy by producing more oil at a minimum price. The surfactants are the major constituent of the injection fluids for EOR applications. Addition of foam-generated surfactants in water alternating gas injection is one of the potential solutions for reducing the gas mobility and improving sweep efficiency, but the major challenge of surfactants used with water alternating gas injection is its stability in presence of formation water and crude oil at reservoir conditions. The objective of this study is to investigate the stable surfactant as a foaming agent to improve the efficiency of residual oil and reduce the gas mobility. To achieve this main objective, individual and new surfactant blended formulations were evaluated with injection water and crude oil in the porous media at 96 °C and 1400 psi. Experimental result showed that generated foam in presence of crude oil has reduced gas mobility which provides good indication of CO2 mobility control and improves sweep efficiency. Oil recovery based on original oil-in-place by surfactant blend of 0.6 wt AOS + 0.6 wt TX 100, 0.6 wt AOS + 0.6 wt LMDO and individual surfactant of 0.6 wt AOS were recorded as 91.9, 83.7 and 72.66, respectively. Foam stability in presence of crude oil, reduction in gas mobility and increase in oil recovery indicated that these surfactant blends are good foaming agents as compared to individual surfactant in enhanced oil recovery applications. © 2016, The Author(s).
format Article
author Memon, M.K.
Elraies, K.A.
Al-Mossawy, M.I.
spellingShingle Memon, M.K.
Elraies, K.A.
Al-Mossawy, M.I.
Impact of new foam surfactant blend with water alternating gas injection on residual oil recovery
author_facet Memon, M.K.
Elraies, K.A.
Al-Mossawy, M.I.
author_sort Memon, M.K.
title Impact of new foam surfactant blend with water alternating gas injection on residual oil recovery
title_short Impact of new foam surfactant blend with water alternating gas injection on residual oil recovery
title_full Impact of new foam surfactant blend with water alternating gas injection on residual oil recovery
title_fullStr Impact of new foam surfactant blend with water alternating gas injection on residual oil recovery
title_full_unstemmed Impact of new foam surfactant blend with water alternating gas injection on residual oil recovery
title_sort impact of new foam surfactant blend with water alternating gas injection on residual oil recovery
publisher Springer Verlag
publishDate 2017
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85027842835&doi=10.1007%2fs13202-016-0303-1&partnerID=40&md5=8b6abe36a7e487bcae012dd7fc02a58d
http://eprints.utp.edu.my/19367/
_version_ 1738656060108963840
score 13.211869

Similar Items