Machine learning classifiers for modeling soil characteristics by geophysics investigations: a comparative study
To design geotechnical structures efficiently, it is important to examine soil's physical properties. Therefore, classifying soil with respect to geophysical parameters is an advantageous and popular approach. Novel, quick, cost, and time effective machine learning techniques can facilitate thi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/91631/1/LimCheeSoon2020_MachineLearningClassifiersforModelingSoil.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/91631/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/APP10175734 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.utm.91631 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utm.916312021-07-14T08:18:52Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/91631/ Machine learning classifiers for modeling soil characteristics by geophysics investigations: a comparative study Lim, Chee Soon Mohamad, Edy Tonnizam Motahari, Mohammad Reza Armaghani, Danial Jahed Saad, Rosli TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) To design geotechnical structures efficiently, it is important to examine soil's physical properties. Therefore, classifying soil with respect to geophysical parameters is an advantageous and popular approach. Novel, quick, cost, and time effective machine learning techniques can facilitate this classification. This study employs three kinds of machine learning models, including the Decision Tree, Artificial Neural Networks, and Bayesian Networks. The Decision tree models included the chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID), classification and regression trees (CART), quick, unbiased, and efficient statistical tree (QUEST), and C5; the Artificial Neural Networks models included Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Radial Basis Function (RBF); and BN models included the Tree Augmented Naïve (TAN) and Markov Blanket, which were employed to predict the soil classifications using geophysics investigations and laboratory tests. The performance of each model was assessed through the accuracy, stability and gains. The results showed that while the BAYESIANMARKOV model achieved the highest overall accuracy (100%) in training phase, this model achieved the lowest accuracy (34.21%) in testing phases. Thus, this model had the worst stability. The QUEST had the second highest overall training accuracy (99.12%) and had the highest overall testing accuracy (94.74%). Thus, this model was somewhat stable and had an acceptable overall training and testing accuracy to predict the soil characteristics. The future studies can use the findings of this paper as a benchmark to classify the soil characteristics and select the best machine learning technique to perform this classification. MDPI 2020-09 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/91631/1/LimCheeSoon2020_MachineLearningClassifiersforModelingSoil.pdf Lim, Chee Soon and Mohamad, Edy Tonnizam and Motahari, Mohammad Reza and Armaghani, Danial Jahed and Saad, Rosli (2020) Machine learning classifiers for modeling soil characteristics by geophysics investigations: a comparative study. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10 (17). pp. 1-21. ISSN 2076-3417 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/APP10175734 DOI:10.3390/APP10175734 |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
building |
UTM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
content_source |
UTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utm.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
spellingShingle |
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Lim, Chee Soon Mohamad, Edy Tonnizam Motahari, Mohammad Reza Armaghani, Danial Jahed Saad, Rosli Machine learning classifiers for modeling soil characteristics by geophysics investigations: a comparative study |
description |
To design geotechnical structures efficiently, it is important to examine soil's physical properties. Therefore, classifying soil with respect to geophysical parameters is an advantageous and popular approach. Novel, quick, cost, and time effective machine learning techniques can facilitate this classification. This study employs three kinds of machine learning models, including the Decision Tree, Artificial Neural Networks, and Bayesian Networks. The Decision tree models included the chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID), classification and regression trees (CART), quick, unbiased, and efficient statistical tree (QUEST), and C5; the Artificial Neural Networks models included Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Radial Basis Function (RBF); and BN models included the Tree Augmented Naïve (TAN) and Markov Blanket, which were employed to predict the soil classifications using geophysics investigations and laboratory tests. The performance of each model was assessed through the accuracy, stability and gains. The results showed that while the BAYESIANMARKOV model achieved the highest overall accuracy (100%) in training phase, this model achieved the lowest accuracy (34.21%) in testing phases. Thus, this model had the worst stability. The QUEST had the second highest overall training accuracy (99.12%) and had the highest overall testing accuracy (94.74%). Thus, this model was somewhat stable and had an acceptable overall training and testing accuracy to predict the soil characteristics. The future studies can use the findings of this paper as a benchmark to classify the soil characteristics and select the best machine learning technique to perform this classification. |
format |
Article |
author |
Lim, Chee Soon Mohamad, Edy Tonnizam Motahari, Mohammad Reza Armaghani, Danial Jahed Saad, Rosli |
author_facet |
Lim, Chee Soon Mohamad, Edy Tonnizam Motahari, Mohammad Reza Armaghani, Danial Jahed Saad, Rosli |
author_sort |
Lim, Chee Soon |
title |
Machine learning classifiers for modeling soil characteristics by geophysics investigations: a comparative study |
title_short |
Machine learning classifiers for modeling soil characteristics by geophysics investigations: a comparative study |
title_full |
Machine learning classifiers for modeling soil characteristics by geophysics investigations: a comparative study |
title_fullStr |
Machine learning classifiers for modeling soil characteristics by geophysics investigations: a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Machine learning classifiers for modeling soil characteristics by geophysics investigations: a comparative study |
title_sort |
machine learning classifiers for modeling soil characteristics by geophysics investigations: a comparative study |
publisher |
MDPI |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/91631/1/LimCheeSoon2020_MachineLearningClassifiersforModelingSoil.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/91631/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/APP10175734 |
_version_ |
1706956973891649536 |
score |
13.223943 |