Identification and ranking of specific balanced scorecard performance measures for hospitals: a case study of private hospitals in the Klang Valley area, Malaysia
Performance measurement is a necessity for private hospitals as they need to be efficient, attract customers, increase profitability, and survive in the competitive environment of the health care industry. Hospitals typically struggle to identify appropriate performance measures because of lack of r...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
John Wiley and Sons Ltd
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/88566/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2799 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Performance measurement is a necessity for private hospitals as they need to be efficient, attract customers, increase profitability, and survive in the competitive environment of the health care industry. Hospitals typically struggle to identify appropriate performance measures because of lack of reliable source of performance measures for private hospitals. Despite numerous studies on performance measurement, few studies have focused on performance measures in private hospitals. This paper aims to fill that gap by identifying and ranking a specific set of performance measures that are feasible and relevant for private hospitals. Forty-four health care performance measures in four balanced scorecard (BSC) performance perspectives (financial, customer, internal business processes, and learning and growth) were compiled and filtered based on “feasibility” and “relevance” criteria using a questionnaire survey in private hospitals in the Klang Valley area, Malaysia. Since all collected data were in numeric format, data analysis was performed quantitatively. Consequently, 31 BSC performance measures were identified for private hospitals. Next, the 31 performance measures went through a ranking survey in Klang Valley private hospitals. Therefore, a weight between 0 and 1 with a range of 0.095 to 0.207 was obtained for each performance measure to help hospitals quantify their overall performance more accurately. |
|---|