A systematic review of studies on use case points and expert-based estimation of software development effort

In recent years, due to significant evolution in adopting new technologies and development methodologies in the field of software engineering, the developers and researchers are striving to optimize the accuracy of software effort estimation (SEE). The overestimation and underestimation both are the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahmood, Y., Kama, N., Azmi, A.
Format: Article
Published: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/86439/
https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smr.2245
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.86439
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.864392020-09-09T07:14:13Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/86439/ A systematic review of studies on use case points and expert-based estimation of software development effort Mahmood, Y. Kama, N. Azmi, A. T Technology (General) In recent years, due to significant evolution in adopting new technologies and development methodologies in the field of software engineering, the developers and researchers are striving to optimize the accuracy of software effort estimation (SEE). The overestimation and underestimation both are the key challenges for software progress; hence, there is a continuous need for an accurate SEE. This paper highlights a systematic review of studies associated with the best practices of use case point (UCP) and expert judgment–based software development effort estimation techniques. The primary aim and contribution of this paper are to support the researchers through an extensive review to ease to other researcher's search for effort estimation studies. We have performed state-of-the-art review from five viewpoints of reference: (a) review of studies concerning UCPs and expert judgment–based effort estimation, (b) research contribution and future recommendation in different novelties, (c) usage of the dataset, (d) availability of accuracy metrics, and (e) findings of the studies. We have performed a systematic review of studies which are published in the period of 2000 to 2019. We have selected a total of 34 primary studies of UCP and expert judgment–based estimation techniques to report the research questions stated in this review. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 2020-07 Article PeerReviewed Mahmood, Y. and Kama, N. and Azmi, A. (2020) A systematic review of studies on use case points and expert-based estimation of software development effort. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 32 (7). ISSN 2047-7481 https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smr.2245 DOI:10.1002/smr.2245
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic T Technology (General)
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
Mahmood, Y.
Kama, N.
Azmi, A.
A systematic review of studies on use case points and expert-based estimation of software development effort
description In recent years, due to significant evolution in adopting new technologies and development methodologies in the field of software engineering, the developers and researchers are striving to optimize the accuracy of software effort estimation (SEE). The overestimation and underestimation both are the key challenges for software progress; hence, there is a continuous need for an accurate SEE. This paper highlights a systematic review of studies associated with the best practices of use case point (UCP) and expert judgment–based software development effort estimation techniques. The primary aim and contribution of this paper are to support the researchers through an extensive review to ease to other researcher's search for effort estimation studies. We have performed state-of-the-art review from five viewpoints of reference: (a) review of studies concerning UCPs and expert judgment–based effort estimation, (b) research contribution and future recommendation in different novelties, (c) usage of the dataset, (d) availability of accuracy metrics, and (e) findings of the studies. We have performed a systematic review of studies which are published in the period of 2000 to 2019. We have selected a total of 34 primary studies of UCP and expert judgment–based estimation techniques to report the research questions stated in this review.
format Article
author Mahmood, Y.
Kama, N.
Azmi, A.
author_facet Mahmood, Y.
Kama, N.
Azmi, A.
author_sort Mahmood, Y.
title A systematic review of studies on use case points and expert-based estimation of software development effort
title_short A systematic review of studies on use case points and expert-based estimation of software development effort
title_full A systematic review of studies on use case points and expert-based estimation of software development effort
title_fullStr A systematic review of studies on use case points and expert-based estimation of software development effort
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of studies on use case points and expert-based estimation of software development effort
title_sort systematic review of studies on use case points and expert-based estimation of software development effort
publisher John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
publishDate 2020
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/86439/
https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smr.2245
_version_ 1677781178078199808
score 13.211869