表紙画像

A comparative analysis of intelligent and PID controllers for an aircraft pitch control system

Aircraft pitch control system is one example of nonlinear complex systems which requires feedback control. Fuzzy logic controllers (FLC) have emerged as intelligent method in controlling such system by utilizing fuzzy logic principle. This paper presents a comparative analysis for the performance of...

詳細記述

保存先:
書誌詳細
主要な著者: Wahid, Herman, Hassan, Abbas Musa, Zahid, Junaid, Saleh Motea, Zakarya Mohammed Nasser, Swan, Htet Lwin
フォーマット: 論文
出版事項: Applications of Modelling and Simulation 2018
主題:
TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
オンライン･アクセス:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/82287/
http://arqiipubl.com
タグ: タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
id my.utm.82287
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.822872019-11-20T06:45:45Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/82287/ A comparative analysis of intelligent and PID controllers for an aircraft pitch control system Wahid, Herman Hassan, Abbas Musa Zahid, Junaid Saleh Motea, Zakarya Mohammed Nasser Swan, Htet Lwin TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering Aircraft pitch control system is one example of nonlinear complex systems which requires feedback control. Fuzzy logic controllers (FLC) have emerged as intelligent method in controlling such system by utilizing fuzzy logic principle. This paper presents a comparative analysis for the performance of proportional-derivative-integral (PID) controller and fuzzy logic controller in controlling the aircraft pitch angle. The input is the elevator deflection angle and the output is the pitch angle of the aircraft. For the fuzzy controller, it is governed by five membership functions and seventeen rules which were tuned repeatedly according to the actual output of the controller corresponding to the customized set point. The procedures of the PID and the FLC design are discussed in methodology section. In general, both PID and FLC perform within the design requirements. However, FLC outperforms PID in three design parameters namely the settling time, the percentage of overshoot and the steady state error, with improvements of 12%, 98% and 97%, respectively. Applications of Modelling and Simulation 2018 Article PeerReviewed Wahid, Herman and Hassan, Abbas Musa and Zahid, Junaid and Saleh Motea, Zakarya Mohammed Nasser and Swan, Htet Lwin (2018) A comparative analysis of intelligent and PID controllers for an aircraft pitch control system. Applications of Modelling and Simulation, 2 (1). pp. 17-25. ISSN 2600-8084 http://arqiipubl.com
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
spellingShingle TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Wahid, Herman
Hassan, Abbas Musa
Zahid, Junaid
Saleh Motea, Zakarya Mohammed Nasser
Swan, Htet Lwin
A comparative analysis of intelligent and PID controllers for an aircraft pitch control system
description Aircraft pitch control system is one example of nonlinear complex systems which requires feedback control. Fuzzy logic controllers (FLC) have emerged as intelligent method in controlling such system by utilizing fuzzy logic principle. This paper presents a comparative analysis for the performance of proportional-derivative-integral (PID) controller and fuzzy logic controller in controlling the aircraft pitch angle. The input is the elevator deflection angle and the output is the pitch angle of the aircraft. For the fuzzy controller, it is governed by five membership functions and seventeen rules which were tuned repeatedly according to the actual output of the controller corresponding to the customized set point. The procedures of the PID and the FLC design are discussed in methodology section. In general, both PID and FLC perform within the design requirements. However, FLC outperforms PID in three design parameters namely the settling time, the percentage of overshoot and the steady state error, with improvements of 12%, 98% and 97%, respectively.
format Article
author Wahid, Herman
Hassan, Abbas Musa
Zahid, Junaid
Saleh Motea, Zakarya Mohammed Nasser
Swan, Htet Lwin
author_facet Wahid, Herman
Hassan, Abbas Musa
Zahid, Junaid
Saleh Motea, Zakarya Mohammed Nasser
Swan, Htet Lwin
author_sort Wahid, Herman
title A comparative analysis of intelligent and PID controllers for an aircraft pitch control system
title_short A comparative analysis of intelligent and PID controllers for an aircraft pitch control system
title_full A comparative analysis of intelligent and PID controllers for an aircraft pitch control system
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of intelligent and PID controllers for an aircraft pitch control system
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of intelligent and PID controllers for an aircraft pitch control system
title_sort comparative analysis of intelligent and pid controllers for an aircraft pitch control system
publisher Applications of Modelling and Simulation
publishDate 2018
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/82287/
http://arqiipubl.com
_version_ 1654960018922930176
score 13.251813

類似資料