Staff View: Do the physical and environment PETTLEP elements predict sport imagery ability?

Do the physical and environment PETTLEP elements predict sport imagery ability?

The present study aimed to examine whether physical and environment elements of PETTLEP imagery relate to the ability to image five types of sport imagery (i.e. skill, strategy, goal, affect and mastery). Two hundred and ninety participants (152 males, 148 females; Mage = 20.24 years, SD = 4.36) fro...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Anuar, N., Williams, S. E., Cumming, J.
Format:	Article
Published:	2017
Subjects:	L Education (General)
Online Access:	http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/81224/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2017.1377290
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my.utm.81224
record_format	eprints
spelling	my.utm.812242019-07-24T03:37:24Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/81224/ Do the physical and environment PETTLEP elements predict sport imagery ability? Anuar, N. Williams, S. E. Cumming, J. L Education (General) The present study aimed to examine whether physical and environment elements of PETTLEP imagery relate to the ability to image five types of sport imagery (i.e. skill, strategy, goal, affect and mastery). Two hundred and ninety participants (152 males, 148 females; Mage = 20.24 years, SD = 4.36) from various sports completed the Sport Imagery Ability Questionnaire (SIAQ), and a set of items designed specifically for the study to assess how frequently participants incorporate physical (e.g. 'I make small movements or gestures during the imagery') and environment (e.g. 'I image in the real training/competition environment') elements of PETTLEP imagery. Structural equation modelling tested a hypothesised model in which imagery priming (i.e. the best fitting physical and environment elements) significantly and positively predicted imagery ability of the different imagery types (skill, β = 0.38; strategy, β = 0.23; goal, β = 0.21; affect, β = 0.25; mastery, β = 0.22). The model was a good fit to the data: χ2 (174) = 263.87, p < .001, CFI = .96, TLI = .95, SRMR = .09, RMSEA = 0.05 (90% CI = 0.03-0.05). Findings displayed that priming imagery with physical and environment elements is associated with better skill, strategy, goal, affect and mastery imagery ability. The findings extend models of imagery use by indicating that how athletes images may influence their imagery ability. 2017-09 Article PeerReviewed Anuar, N. and Williams, S. E. and Cumming, J. (2017) Do the physical and environment PETTLEP elements predict sport imagery ability? European Journal of Sport Science, 17 (10). pp. 1319-1327. ISSN 1746-1391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2017.1377290
institution	Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building	UTM Library
collection	Institutional Repository
continent	Asia
country	Malaysia
content_provider	Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source	UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider	http://eprints.utm.my/
topic	L Education (General)
spellingShingle	L Education (General) Anuar, N. Williams, S. E. Cumming, J. Do the physical and environment PETTLEP elements predict sport imagery ability?
description	The present study aimed to examine whether physical and environment elements of PETTLEP imagery relate to the ability to image five types of sport imagery (i.e. skill, strategy, goal, affect and mastery). Two hundred and ninety participants (152 males, 148 females; Mage = 20.24 years, SD = 4.36) from various sports completed the Sport Imagery Ability Questionnaire (SIAQ), and a set of items designed specifically for the study to assess how frequently participants incorporate physical (e.g. 'I make small movements or gestures during the imagery') and environment (e.g. 'I image in the real training/competition environment') elements of PETTLEP imagery. Structural equation modelling tested a hypothesised model in which imagery priming (i.e. the best fitting physical and environment elements) significantly and positively predicted imagery ability of the different imagery types (skill, β = 0.38; strategy, β = 0.23; goal, β = 0.21; affect, β = 0.25; mastery, β = 0.22). The model was a good fit to the data: χ2 (174) = 263.87, p < .001, CFI = .96, TLI = .95, SRMR = .09, RMSEA = 0.05 (90% CI = 0.03-0.05). Findings displayed that priming imagery with physical and environment elements is associated with better skill, strategy, goal, affect and mastery imagery ability. The findings extend models of imagery use by indicating that how athletes images may influence their imagery ability.
format	Article
author	Anuar, N. Williams, S. E. Cumming, J.
author_facet	Anuar, N. Williams, S. E. Cumming, J.
author_sort	Anuar, N.
title	Do the physical and environment PETTLEP elements predict sport imagery ability?
title_short	Do the physical and environment PETTLEP elements predict sport imagery ability?
title_full	Do the physical and environment PETTLEP elements predict sport imagery ability?
title_fullStr	Do the physical and environment PETTLEP elements predict sport imagery ability?
title_full_unstemmed	Do the physical and environment PETTLEP elements predict sport imagery ability?
title_sort	do the physical and environment pettlep elements predict sport imagery ability?
publishDate	2017
url	http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/81224/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2017.1377290
_version_	1643658647217111040
score	13.211869

Do the physical and environment PETTLEP elements predict sport imagery ability?

Similar Items