Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia

Comparison of Jason-1 altimetry retracked sea levels and high frequency (HF) radar velocity is examined within the region of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. The comparison between both datasets is not direct because the altimetry derives only the geostrophic component, while the HF radar velocity...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Idris, N. H., Deng, X.
Format: Article
Published: SPIE 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/76427/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021147687&doi=10.1117%2f1.JRS.11.032403&partnerID=40&md5=cadf7c58c55dc006c3900066f52e0752
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.76427
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.764272018-04-30T13:21:22Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/76427/ Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia Idris, N. H. Deng, X. Idris, N. H. G109.5 Global Positioning System Comparison of Jason-1 altimetry retracked sea levels and high frequency (HF) radar velocity is examined within the region of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. The comparison between both datasets is not direct because the altimetry derives only the geostrophic component, while the HF radar velocity includes information on both geostrophic and ageostrophic components, such as tides and winds. The comparison of altimetry and HF radar data is performed based on the parameter of surface velocity inferred from both datasets. The results show that 48% (10 out of 21 cases) of data have high (=0.5) spatial correlation. The mean of spatial correlation for all 21 cases is 0.43. This value is within the range (0.42 to 0.5) observed by other studies. Low correlation is observed due to disagreement in the trend of velocity signals in which sometimes they have contradictions in the signal direction and the position of the peak is shifted. In terms of standard deviation of difference and root mean square error, both datasets show reasonable agreement with ≤ 2.5 cm s-1. SPIE 2017 Article PeerReviewed Idris, N. H. and Deng, X. and Idris, N. H. (2017) Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 11 (3). ISSN 1931-3195 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021147687&doi=10.1117%2f1.JRS.11.032403&partnerID=40&md5=cadf7c58c55dc006c3900066f52e0752 DOI:10.1117/1.JRS.11.032403
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic G109.5 Global Positioning System
spellingShingle G109.5 Global Positioning System
Idris, N. H.
Deng, X.
Idris, N. H.
Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
description Comparison of Jason-1 altimetry retracked sea levels and high frequency (HF) radar velocity is examined within the region of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. The comparison between both datasets is not direct because the altimetry derives only the geostrophic component, while the HF radar velocity includes information on both geostrophic and ageostrophic components, such as tides and winds. The comparison of altimetry and HF radar data is performed based on the parameter of surface velocity inferred from both datasets. The results show that 48% (10 out of 21 cases) of data have high (=0.5) spatial correlation. The mean of spatial correlation for all 21 cases is 0.43. This value is within the range (0.42 to 0.5) observed by other studies. Low correlation is observed due to disagreement in the trend of velocity signals in which sometimes they have contradictions in the signal direction and the position of the peak is shifted. In terms of standard deviation of difference and root mean square error, both datasets show reasonable agreement with ≤ 2.5 cm s-1.
format Article
author Idris, N. H.
Deng, X.
Idris, N. H.
author_facet Idris, N. H.
Deng, X.
Idris, N. H.
author_sort Idris, N. H.
title Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
title_short Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
title_full Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
title_fullStr Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
title_sort comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the great barrier reef, australia
publisher SPIE
publishDate 2017
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/76427/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021147687&doi=10.1117%2f1.JRS.11.032403&partnerID=40&md5=cadf7c58c55dc006c3900066f52e0752
_version_ 1643657307907686400
score 13.211869