Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
Comparison of Jason-1 altimetry retracked sea levels and high frequency (HF) radar velocity is examined within the region of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. The comparison between both datasets is not direct because the altimetry derives only the geostrophic component, while the HF radar velocity...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
SPIE
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/76427/ https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021147687&doi=10.1117%2f1.JRS.11.032403&partnerID=40&md5=cadf7c58c55dc006c3900066f52e0752 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.utm.76427 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utm.764272018-04-30T13:21:22Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/76427/ Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia Idris, N. H. Deng, X. Idris, N. H. G109.5 Global Positioning System Comparison of Jason-1 altimetry retracked sea levels and high frequency (HF) radar velocity is examined within the region of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. The comparison between both datasets is not direct because the altimetry derives only the geostrophic component, while the HF radar velocity includes information on both geostrophic and ageostrophic components, such as tides and winds. The comparison of altimetry and HF radar data is performed based on the parameter of surface velocity inferred from both datasets. The results show that 48% (10 out of 21 cases) of data have high (=0.5) spatial correlation. The mean of spatial correlation for all 21 cases is 0.43. This value is within the range (0.42 to 0.5) observed by other studies. Low correlation is observed due to disagreement in the trend of velocity signals in which sometimes they have contradictions in the signal direction and the position of the peak is shifted. In terms of standard deviation of difference and root mean square error, both datasets show reasonable agreement with ≤ 2.5 cm s-1. SPIE 2017 Article PeerReviewed Idris, N. H. and Deng, X. and Idris, N. H. (2017) Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 11 (3). ISSN 1931-3195 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021147687&doi=10.1117%2f1.JRS.11.032403&partnerID=40&md5=cadf7c58c55dc006c3900066f52e0752 DOI:10.1117/1.JRS.11.032403 |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
building |
UTM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
content_source |
UTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utm.my/ |
topic |
G109.5 Global Positioning System |
spellingShingle |
G109.5 Global Positioning System Idris, N. H. Deng, X. Idris, N. H. Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia |
description |
Comparison of Jason-1 altimetry retracked sea levels and high frequency (HF) radar velocity is examined within the region of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. The comparison between both datasets is not direct because the altimetry derives only the geostrophic component, while the HF radar velocity includes information on both geostrophic and ageostrophic components, such as tides and winds. The comparison of altimetry and HF radar data is performed based on the parameter of surface velocity inferred from both datasets. The results show that 48% (10 out of 21 cases) of data have high (=0.5) spatial correlation. The mean of spatial correlation for all 21 cases is 0.43. This value is within the range (0.42 to 0.5) observed by other studies. Low correlation is observed due to disagreement in the trend of velocity signals in which sometimes they have contradictions in the signal direction and the position of the peak is shifted. In terms of standard deviation of difference and root mean square error, both datasets show reasonable agreement with ≤ 2.5 cm s-1. |
format |
Article |
author |
Idris, N. H. Deng, X. Idris, N. H. |
author_facet |
Idris, N. H. Deng, X. Idris, N. H. |
author_sort |
Idris, N. H. |
title |
Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia |
title_short |
Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia |
title_full |
Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia |
title_sort |
comparison of retracked coastal altimetry sea levels against high frequency radar on the continental shelf of the great barrier reef, australia |
publisher |
SPIE |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/76427/ https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021147687&doi=10.1117%2f1.JRS.11.032403&partnerID=40&md5=cadf7c58c55dc006c3900066f52e0752 |
_version_ |
1643657307907686400 |
score |
13.211869 |