Selection and aggregation of interestingness measures: a review
Association Rule Mining is the process of retrieving frequent patterns that occur in a transaction database. Initially used as a market basket analysis solution for retail businesses, it has grown to cover many other fields such as medicine [1, 2], traffic estimation [3] and anomaly detection [4, 5]...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN)
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/62544/ http://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol59No1/17Vol59No1.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.utm.62544 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.utm.625442017-06-18T06:11:03Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/62544/ Selection and aggregation of interestingness measures: a review Anwar, Toni Bong, Kok Keong Christoph, Quix Machnizam, Selvakumar Matthias, Joest QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science Association Rule Mining is the process of retrieving frequent patterns that occur in a transaction database. Initially used as a market basket analysis solution for retail businesses, it has grown to cover many other fields such as medicine [1, 2], traffic estimation [3] and anomaly detection [4, 5]. An association rule has two components (antecedent and consequent) which is derived from a pattern (a set of items). However, it is not clear when investigating a frequent item set, which items imply the others (i.e., which is antecedent, and which is consequent). Therefore, several combinations of items as antecedent and consequent are generated. This leads to a huge amount of association rules being output by an algorithm for Association Rule Mining. Thus, it is imperative that data miners require some type of measures to evaluate the "interestingness" of these rules. There exist in excess of 70 well-known measures and countless other manually crafted measures in the literature. In this survey, we systematically discuss the methods which users could use to select or aggregate the interestingness measures, applicability of such methods and evaluation of the usage of such methods. Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN) 2014 Article PeerReviewed Anwar, Toni and Bong, Kok Keong and Christoph, Quix and Machnizam, Selvakumar and Matthias, Joest (2014) Selection and aggregation of interestingness measures: a review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 59 (1). pp. 146-166. ISSN 1992-8645 http://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol59No1/17Vol59No1.pdf |
institution |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
building |
UTM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
content_source |
UTM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.utm.my/ |
topic |
QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science |
spellingShingle |
QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science Anwar, Toni Bong, Kok Keong Christoph, Quix Machnizam, Selvakumar Matthias, Joest Selection and aggregation of interestingness measures: a review |
description |
Association Rule Mining is the process of retrieving frequent patterns that occur in a transaction database. Initially used as a market basket analysis solution for retail businesses, it has grown to cover many other fields such as medicine [1, 2], traffic estimation [3] and anomaly detection [4, 5]. An association rule has two components (antecedent and consequent) which is derived from a pattern (a set of items). However, it is not clear when investigating a frequent item set, which items imply the others (i.e., which is antecedent, and which is consequent). Therefore, several combinations of items as antecedent and consequent are generated. This leads to a huge amount of association rules being output by an algorithm for Association Rule Mining. Thus, it is imperative that data miners require some type of measures to evaluate the "interestingness" of these rules. There exist in excess of 70 well-known measures and countless other manually crafted measures in the literature. In this survey, we systematically discuss the methods which users could use to select or aggregate the interestingness measures, applicability of such methods and evaluation of the usage of such methods. |
format |
Article |
author |
Anwar, Toni Bong, Kok Keong Christoph, Quix Machnizam, Selvakumar Matthias, Joest |
author_facet |
Anwar, Toni Bong, Kok Keong Christoph, Quix Machnizam, Selvakumar Matthias, Joest |
author_sort |
Anwar, Toni |
title |
Selection and aggregation of interestingness measures: a review |
title_short |
Selection and aggregation of interestingness measures: a review |
title_full |
Selection and aggregation of interestingness measures: a review |
title_fullStr |
Selection and aggregation of interestingness measures: a review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Selection and aggregation of interestingness measures: a review |
title_sort |
selection and aggregation of interestingness measures: a review |
publisher |
Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN) |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/62544/ http://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol59No1/17Vol59No1.pdf |
_version_ |
1643655450818772992 |
score |
13.211869 |