Feasibility study of wing-in-ground for marine rescue operation

This study aims to investigate performance of current rescue facilities and position based on statistic data of sea accident between 2010 and 2011 in Kepulauan Riau. Current rescue facilities are located at the latitude 0.93105 and longitude 104.44359. Using the statistic data, an optimal recue loca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaswar, Koto, Prayetno, E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit UTM 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/52868/1/KotoJaswar2014_Feasibilitystudyofwing-in-ground.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/52868/
https://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3265
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.52868
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.528682018-07-19T07:18:38Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/52868/ Feasibility study of wing-in-ground for marine rescue operation Jaswar, Koto Prayetno, E. TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery This study aims to investigate performance of current rescue facilities and position based on statistic data of sea accident between 2010 and 2011 in Kepulauan Riau. Current rescue facilities are located at the latitude 0.93105 and longitude 104.44359. Using the statistic data, an optimal recue location and facilities in Kepulauan Riau are determine based on International Maritime Organization (IMO) standard. International Maritime Organization requirement, an emergency, passengers should be able to leave the ship with time 60 minutes. The optimal position and rescue facilities are determined using Great Circle Distance-Spherical Trigonometry and Statistical of Standard Error methods. In this study, simulation code is developed using visual basic 2010 language. Results of simulation show current rescue facility requires a lot of time to reach the accident location which is up to 12.5 hours. In order to meet IMO requirement, this study proposes wing in ground for rescue operation. Using current rescue location, wing in ground also does not meet the IMO standard which is up to 3.04 hours. Additional, this study divides the Kepulauan Riau into two regions of rescue operation. The optimal for rescue facilities of region 1, at the latitude 0.74568 and longitude 104.36256, and based on the distribution of the accidents in Kepulauan Riau 2010-2011, current rescue facility required up to 5.6 hours to reach the accident area, while the wing in ground facilities required up to 1.3 hours. The optimal for rescue facilities of region 2, at the latitude 3.00338 and longitude 107.79373, current rescue facility required up to 5 hours to reach the accident area, while the wing in ground facilities required shorter time that is up to 1.2 hour. Penerbit UTM 2014 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/52868/1/KotoJaswar2014_Feasibilitystudyofwing-in-ground.pdf Jaswar, Koto and Prayetno, E. (2014) Feasibility study of wing-in-ground for marine rescue operation. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering), 69 (7). pp. 53-57. ISSN 0012-79696 https://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3265 DOI: 10.11113/jt.v69.3265
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
spellingShingle TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Jaswar, Koto
Prayetno, E.
Feasibility study of wing-in-ground for marine rescue operation
description This study aims to investigate performance of current rescue facilities and position based on statistic data of sea accident between 2010 and 2011 in Kepulauan Riau. Current rescue facilities are located at the latitude 0.93105 and longitude 104.44359. Using the statistic data, an optimal recue location and facilities in Kepulauan Riau are determine based on International Maritime Organization (IMO) standard. International Maritime Organization requirement, an emergency, passengers should be able to leave the ship with time 60 minutes. The optimal position and rescue facilities are determined using Great Circle Distance-Spherical Trigonometry and Statistical of Standard Error methods. In this study, simulation code is developed using visual basic 2010 language. Results of simulation show current rescue facility requires a lot of time to reach the accident location which is up to 12.5 hours. In order to meet IMO requirement, this study proposes wing in ground for rescue operation. Using current rescue location, wing in ground also does not meet the IMO standard which is up to 3.04 hours. Additional, this study divides the Kepulauan Riau into two regions of rescue operation. The optimal for rescue facilities of region 1, at the latitude 0.74568 and longitude 104.36256, and based on the distribution of the accidents in Kepulauan Riau 2010-2011, current rescue facility required up to 5.6 hours to reach the accident area, while the wing in ground facilities required up to 1.3 hours. The optimal for rescue facilities of region 2, at the latitude 3.00338 and longitude 107.79373, current rescue facility required up to 5 hours to reach the accident area, while the wing in ground facilities required shorter time that is up to 1.2 hour.
format Article
author Jaswar, Koto
Prayetno, E.
author_facet Jaswar, Koto
Prayetno, E.
author_sort Jaswar, Koto
title Feasibility study of wing-in-ground for marine rescue operation
title_short Feasibility study of wing-in-ground for marine rescue operation
title_full Feasibility study of wing-in-ground for marine rescue operation
title_fullStr Feasibility study of wing-in-ground for marine rescue operation
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility study of wing-in-ground for marine rescue operation
title_sort feasibility study of wing-in-ground for marine rescue operation
publisher Penerbit UTM
publishDate 2014
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/52868/1/KotoJaswar2014_Feasibilitystudyofwing-in-ground.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/52868/
https://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3265
_version_ 1643653280072466432
score 13.211869