A new buffering design concept for Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP)

Priority Queuing (PQ) algorithm is a more popular technique which used in the VoIP network to reduce delays. In the PQ algorithm there are four buffering packet are low, normal, medium and high. The buffering packet in PQ algorithm is greedy. However, fourth the buffering is not optimal used. It is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suardinata, Suardinata, Abu Bakar, Kamalrulnizam
Format: Article
Published: International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/37827/
https://sites.google.com/site/ijciisresearch/vol-2-no-6-june-2011
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.37827
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.378272017-10-25T04:40:42Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/37827/ A new buffering design concept for Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP) Suardinata, Suardinata Abu Bakar, Kamalrulnizam QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science Priority Queuing (PQ) algorithm is a more popular technique which used in the VoIP network to reduce delays. In the PQ algorithm there are four buffering packet are low, normal, medium and high. The buffering packet in PQ algorithm is greedy. However, fourth the buffering is not optimal used. It is caused by PQ algorithm is based on the priority, whereas this buffering just always serviced is highest priority. While under priority are rarely or never serviced will cause other buffering rarely used. While SPBA algorithm is architecture easiest and it does not need any resource reservation or threshold dropping, but only makes use of priority scheduling. On the SPBA algorithm, where incoming packets are placed into the two priority traffic classes is high class and low class. On the SPBA algorithm is there are not available reservation sources to save the remaining packets when the explosion (burst) traffic occurred, which could impact to packet drop and packet loss. Then, with the efficiency of PQ buffering algorithm, can provide greater impact to reduce delays. This paper showed a new buffer design to simplify two concepts buffer in the PQ algorithm and SPBA algorithm. In the new buffering algorithm, simplify four buffering into three packets (High, Medium and Low) is proposed. In the new buffering algorithm able to handle, solve problems and weaknesses of both algorithms. The new buffering design is expected to provide a better solution for the packet buffering. In the new buffering algorithm, greedy packet buffering does not occur as the PQ algorithm and then discard packets, dropped packets, and packet loss does not happen again like as occurred in the SPBA algorithm. International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security 2012 Article PeerReviewed Suardinata, Suardinata and Abu Bakar, Kamalrulnizam (2012) A new buffering design concept for Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP). International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security, 2 (6). pp. 31-40. ISSN 22495789 https://sites.google.com/site/ijciisresearch/vol-2-no-6-june-2011
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
spellingShingle QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Suardinata, Suardinata
Abu Bakar, Kamalrulnizam
A new buffering design concept for Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP)
description Priority Queuing (PQ) algorithm is a more popular technique which used in the VoIP network to reduce delays. In the PQ algorithm there are four buffering packet are low, normal, medium and high. The buffering packet in PQ algorithm is greedy. However, fourth the buffering is not optimal used. It is caused by PQ algorithm is based on the priority, whereas this buffering just always serviced is highest priority. While under priority are rarely or never serviced will cause other buffering rarely used. While SPBA algorithm is architecture easiest and it does not need any resource reservation or threshold dropping, but only makes use of priority scheduling. On the SPBA algorithm, where incoming packets are placed into the two priority traffic classes is high class and low class. On the SPBA algorithm is there are not available reservation sources to save the remaining packets when the explosion (burst) traffic occurred, which could impact to packet drop and packet loss. Then, with the efficiency of PQ buffering algorithm, can provide greater impact to reduce delays. This paper showed a new buffer design to simplify two concepts buffer in the PQ algorithm and SPBA algorithm. In the new buffering algorithm, simplify four buffering into three packets (High, Medium and Low) is proposed. In the new buffering algorithm able to handle, solve problems and weaknesses of both algorithms. The new buffering design is expected to provide a better solution for the packet buffering. In the new buffering algorithm, greedy packet buffering does not occur as the PQ algorithm and then discard packets, dropped packets, and packet loss does not happen again like as occurred in the SPBA algorithm.
format Article
author Suardinata, Suardinata
Abu Bakar, Kamalrulnizam
author_facet Suardinata, Suardinata
Abu Bakar, Kamalrulnizam
author_sort Suardinata, Suardinata
title A new buffering design concept for Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP)
title_short A new buffering design concept for Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP)
title_full A new buffering design concept for Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP)
title_fullStr A new buffering design concept for Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP)
title_full_unstemmed A new buffering design concept for Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP)
title_sort new buffering design concept for voice over internet protocol (voip)
publisher International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Information Security
publishDate 2012
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/37827/
https://sites.google.com/site/ijciisresearch/vol-2-no-6-june-2011
_version_ 1643650169921601536
score 13.211869