Cover Image

Erosion rate model comparison of electrical discharge machining process

This paper reports a comparison studies between two erosion rate model and experimental results of an Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) process for high gap current. Two erosion rate models are Dimensional Analysis (DA) model and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model that have been summarized fro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yahya, Azli, Andromeda, Trias, Abdul Rahim, Muhammad Arif, Baharom, Ameruddin
Format: Book Section
Published: IEEE 2012
Subjects:
TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/35765/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICIAS.2012.6306172
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.35765
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.357652017-02-04T06:43:06Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/35765/ Erosion rate model comparison of electrical discharge machining process Yahya, Azli Andromeda, Trias Abdul Rahim, Muhammad Arif Baharom, Ameruddin TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering This paper reports a comparison studies between two erosion rate model and experimental results of an Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) process for high gap current. Two erosion rate models are Dimensional Analysis (DA) model and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model that have been summarized from the previous author's publication. The data analysis is based on a copper electrode and steel workpiece materials. The result indicated that the ANN model provides better accuracy than the DA model when compared to the experimental results. IEEE 2012 Book Section PeerReviewed Yahya, Azli and Andromeda, Trias and Abdul Rahim, Muhammad Arif and Baharom, Ameruddin (2012) Erosion rate model comparison of electrical discharge machining process. In: ICIAS 2012 - 2012 4th International Conference on Intelligent and Advanced Systems: A Conference of World Engineering, Science and Technology Congress (ESTCON) - Conference Proceedings. IEEE, New York, USA, pp. 122-125. ISBN 978-145771967-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICIAS.2012.6306172 DOI:10.1109/ICIAS.2012.6306172
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
spellingShingle TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Yahya, Azli
Andromeda, Trias
Abdul Rahim, Muhammad Arif
Baharom, Ameruddin
Erosion rate model comparison of electrical discharge machining process
description This paper reports a comparison studies between two erosion rate model and experimental results of an Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) process for high gap current. Two erosion rate models are Dimensional Analysis (DA) model and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model that have been summarized from the previous author's publication. The data analysis is based on a copper electrode and steel workpiece materials. The result indicated that the ANN model provides better accuracy than the DA model when compared to the experimental results.
format Book Section
author Yahya, Azli
Andromeda, Trias
Abdul Rahim, Muhammad Arif
Baharom, Ameruddin
author_facet Yahya, Azli
Andromeda, Trias
Abdul Rahim, Muhammad Arif
Baharom, Ameruddin
author_sort Yahya, Azli
title Erosion rate model comparison of electrical discharge machining process
title_short Erosion rate model comparison of electrical discharge machining process
title_full Erosion rate model comparison of electrical discharge machining process
title_fullStr Erosion rate model comparison of electrical discharge machining process
title_full_unstemmed Erosion rate model comparison of electrical discharge machining process
title_sort erosion rate model comparison of electrical discharge machining process
publisher IEEE
publishDate 2012
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/35765/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICIAS.2012.6306172
_version_ 1643649833355968512
score 13.211869

Similar Items