Reply to comments on "compact, high-Q, and low-current dissipation CMOS differential active inductor"
Based on the above analysis, it is clearly shown that the differential circuit in Fig. 1 is two-port, non-reciprocal, and “gyrates” a current into a voltage, and vice-versa. Thus we would prefer to refer it as a “non-ideal differential gyrator” due to its non-zero main-diagonal entries in (1). In fa...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
IEEE
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/33495/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LMWC.2012.2213242 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Based on the above analysis, it is clearly shown that the differential circuit in Fig. 1 is two-port, non-reciprocal, and “gyrates” a current into a voltage, and vice-versa. Thus we would prefer to refer it as a “non-ideal differential gyrator” due to its non-zero main-diagonal entries in (1). In fact, when the common-gate amplifier was used to implement the non-inverting amplifier in a gyrator, such as in [2] and [3], the main-diagonal entry in the admittance matrix of the gyrator will also significantly deviate from zero. |
|---|