Cover Image

Peer-To-Peer Corrective Feedback In A Group Interaction

The study investigated the provision of corrective feedback and learner repair of errors following feedback in interactional context of peer-to-peer conversations, particularly in a group setting. A total of four students in their early twenties participated in the study. These students are particip...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdul Raof, Abdul Halim, Che Razali, Sulia Masturina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2010
Subjects:
L Education (General)
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/11202/1/Peer-To-Peer_Corrective_Feedback_In_A_Group_Interaction.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/11202/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.11202
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.112022017-09-27T01:28:27Z http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/11202/ Peer-To-Peer Corrective Feedback In A Group Interaction Abdul Raof, Abdul Halim Che Razali, Sulia Masturina L Education (General) The study investigated the provision of corrective feedback and learner repair of errors following feedback in interactional context of peer-to-peer conversations, particularly in a group setting. A total of four students in their early twenties participated in the study. These students are participants of the “Friends of English” (FoE) programme conducted by Centre of Teaching and Learning, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. The relationship among error types, feedback types and learner repairs were examined. The interaction between these students in a group setting was recorded using Sony Sound Forge. The recorded interactions were transcribed and coded for types of errors (Syntactic / Lexical / L1), types of negative implicit feedback (Negotiation / Recasts) and learner repairs. Findings indicate that the mentor focused on recasts. He provided implicit negative feedback in the form of recasts to all three types of learner errors while engaging in the discussions. The majority of L1 errors were corrected followed by Lexical errors. Syntactic errors had the least number of repairs. Lexical error was the focus of the mentor as over half of Lexical errors received feedback followed by Syntactic error and L1 use. 2010-12-02 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/11202/1/Peer-To-Peer_Corrective_Feedback_In_A_Group_Interaction.pdf Abdul Raof, Abdul Halim and Che Razali, Sulia Masturina (2010) Peer-To-Peer Corrective Feedback In A Group Interaction. Peer-To-Peer Corrective Feedback In A Group Interaction . pp. 1-6. (Unpublished)
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic L Education (General)
spellingShingle L Education (General)
Abdul Raof, Abdul Halim
Che Razali, Sulia Masturina
Peer-To-Peer Corrective Feedback In A Group Interaction
description The study investigated the provision of corrective feedback and learner repair of errors following feedback in interactional context of peer-to-peer conversations, particularly in a group setting. A total of four students in their early twenties participated in the study. These students are participants of the “Friends of English” (FoE) programme conducted by Centre of Teaching and Learning, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. The relationship among error types, feedback types and learner repairs were examined. The interaction between these students in a group setting was recorded using Sony Sound Forge. The recorded interactions were transcribed and coded for types of errors (Syntactic / Lexical / L1), types of negative implicit feedback (Negotiation / Recasts) and learner repairs. Findings indicate that the mentor focused on recasts. He provided implicit negative feedback in the form of recasts to all three types of learner errors while engaging in the discussions. The majority of L1 errors were corrected followed by Lexical errors. Syntactic errors had the least number of repairs. Lexical error was the focus of the mentor as over half of Lexical errors received feedback followed by Syntactic error and L1 use.
format Article
author Abdul Raof, Abdul Halim
Che Razali, Sulia Masturina
author_facet Abdul Raof, Abdul Halim
Che Razali, Sulia Masturina
author_sort Abdul Raof, Abdul Halim
title Peer-To-Peer Corrective Feedback In A Group Interaction
title_short Peer-To-Peer Corrective Feedback In A Group Interaction
title_full Peer-To-Peer Corrective Feedback In A Group Interaction
title_fullStr Peer-To-Peer Corrective Feedback In A Group Interaction
title_full_unstemmed Peer-To-Peer Corrective Feedback In A Group Interaction
title_sort peer-to-peer corrective feedback in a group interaction
publishDate 2010
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/11202/1/Peer-To-Peer_Corrective_Feedback_In_A_Group_Interaction.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/11202/
_version_ 1643645614904311808
score 13.211869

Similar Items