Comparative analysis of grid-connected bifacial and standard mono-facial photovoltaic solar systems

This paper describes the design of a solar photovoltaic (PV) system using simulation of PVsyst software. This work involves the simulation of bifacial and mono-facial PV solar in a large-scale solar system. For a bifacial system, the yearly total energy to the grid is 1699.6 MWh, with an average of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdul Kahar, Nor Hidayah, Azhan, Nurul Hanis, Alhamrouni, Ibrahim, Zulkifli, Muhammad Nubli, Tole Sutikno, Tole Sutikno, Jusoh, Awang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/105690/1/AwangJusoh2023_ComparativeAnalysisOfGridConnectedBifacial.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/105690/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/eei.v12i4.5072
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.105690
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.1056902024-05-15T06:44:34Z http://eprints.utm.my/105690/ Comparative analysis of grid-connected bifacial and standard mono-facial photovoltaic solar systems Abdul Kahar, Nor Hidayah Azhan, Nurul Hanis Alhamrouni, Ibrahim Zulkifli, Muhammad Nubli Tole Sutikno, Tole Sutikno Jusoh, Awang TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering This paper describes the design of a solar photovoltaic (PV) system using simulation of PVsyst software. This work involves the simulation of bifacial and mono-facial PV solar in a large-scale solar system. For a bifacial system, the yearly total energy to the grid is 1699.6 MWh, with an average of 4.57 kWh/kWp/day. For a mono-facial system, the total energy to the grid over the year is 1645.3 MWh, with an average of 4.05 kWh/kWp/day. The average collection losses obtained for bifacial and mono-facial modules were 0.33 kWh/kWp/day and 0.82 kWh/kWp/day, respectively, with system losses of 0.15 kWh/kWp/day (bifacial) and 0.18 kWh/kWp/day (mono-facial). The average performance ratio for bifacial and mono-facial was 0.904 and 0.801, respectively. The bifacial PV system was able to generate profit in terms of Return on investment (ROI), around 357%, and reach a breakeven around 7 years. The payback period for a mono-facial PV system was around 8.1 years, with an ROI of 290.4%. This work mainly focuses on a comparative analysis of bifacial and mono-facial photovoltaics, emphasizing the effectiveness and the implementation suitability of bifacial photovoltaics over mono-facial PV solar systems. Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 2023 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/105690/1/AwangJusoh2023_ComparativeAnalysisOfGridConnectedBifacial.pdf Abdul Kahar, Nor Hidayah and Azhan, Nurul Hanis and Alhamrouni, Ibrahim and Zulkifli, Muhammad Nubli and Tole Sutikno, Tole Sutikno and Jusoh, Awang (2023) Comparative analysis of grid-connected bifacial and standard mono-facial photovoltaic solar systems. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 12 (4). pp. 1993-2004. ISSN 2089-3191 http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/eei.v12i4.5072 DOI : 10.11591/eei.v12i4.5072
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
language English
topic TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
spellingShingle TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Abdul Kahar, Nor Hidayah
Azhan, Nurul Hanis
Alhamrouni, Ibrahim
Zulkifli, Muhammad Nubli
Tole Sutikno, Tole Sutikno
Jusoh, Awang
Comparative analysis of grid-connected bifacial and standard mono-facial photovoltaic solar systems
description This paper describes the design of a solar photovoltaic (PV) system using simulation of PVsyst software. This work involves the simulation of bifacial and mono-facial PV solar in a large-scale solar system. For a bifacial system, the yearly total energy to the grid is 1699.6 MWh, with an average of 4.57 kWh/kWp/day. For a mono-facial system, the total energy to the grid over the year is 1645.3 MWh, with an average of 4.05 kWh/kWp/day. The average collection losses obtained for bifacial and mono-facial modules were 0.33 kWh/kWp/day and 0.82 kWh/kWp/day, respectively, with system losses of 0.15 kWh/kWp/day (bifacial) and 0.18 kWh/kWp/day (mono-facial). The average performance ratio for bifacial and mono-facial was 0.904 and 0.801, respectively. The bifacial PV system was able to generate profit in terms of Return on investment (ROI), around 357%, and reach a breakeven around 7 years. The payback period for a mono-facial PV system was around 8.1 years, with an ROI of 290.4%. This work mainly focuses on a comparative analysis of bifacial and mono-facial photovoltaics, emphasizing the effectiveness and the implementation suitability of bifacial photovoltaics over mono-facial PV solar systems.
format Article
author Abdul Kahar, Nor Hidayah
Azhan, Nurul Hanis
Alhamrouni, Ibrahim
Zulkifli, Muhammad Nubli
Tole Sutikno, Tole Sutikno
Jusoh, Awang
author_facet Abdul Kahar, Nor Hidayah
Azhan, Nurul Hanis
Alhamrouni, Ibrahim
Zulkifli, Muhammad Nubli
Tole Sutikno, Tole Sutikno
Jusoh, Awang
author_sort Abdul Kahar, Nor Hidayah
title Comparative analysis of grid-connected bifacial and standard mono-facial photovoltaic solar systems
title_short Comparative analysis of grid-connected bifacial and standard mono-facial photovoltaic solar systems
title_full Comparative analysis of grid-connected bifacial and standard mono-facial photovoltaic solar systems
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of grid-connected bifacial and standard mono-facial photovoltaic solar systems
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of grid-connected bifacial and standard mono-facial photovoltaic solar systems
title_sort comparative analysis of grid-connected bifacial and standard mono-facial photovoltaic solar systems
publisher Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
publishDate 2023
url http://eprints.utm.my/105690/1/AwangJusoh2023_ComparativeAnalysisOfGridConnectedBifacial.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/105690/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/eei.v12i4.5072
_version_ 1800082648949850112
score 13.211869