The correlation of haptenation of gold nanoparticles and cysteine modified screen printed carbon electrode by impedance technique with local lymph node assay data
Skin sensitization occurs when a skin sensitizer binds covalently to skin proteins through the haptenation process. The objective of this study was to correlate the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data of a screen printed carbon electrode (SPCE) modified with cysteine and gold nanoparti...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Elsevier Ltd
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/104653/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2022.105433 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Skin sensitization occurs when a skin sensitizer binds covalently to skin proteins through the haptenation process. The objective of this study was to correlate the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data of a screen printed carbon electrode (SPCE) modified with cysteine and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with local lymph node assay (LLNA) data as a potential skin sensitizer biosensor. The EIS was used to quantify variations in charge transfer resistance of skin sensitizers (ΔRCTskin sensitizer) due to different binding rates of skin sensitizers to cysteine. SPCE was modified through electrodeposition of AuNPs/thiourea/self–assembly of AuNPs/cysteine (assigned as ETSC) for the detection of skin sensitizers. Surface analysis of modified SPCEs using FESEM and EDX revealed a smooth surface with an uneven distribution of cysteine with AuNPs molecules. The ETSC modified SPCE showed a significant skin sensitizer biosensor since the ΔRCTskin sensitizer readings were increased proportionally to the strength of the skin sensitizers, with strong/extreme skin sensitizers displaying higher ΔRCTskin sensitizer readings compared to moderate and weak/non–skin sensitizers. The skin sensitization analysis from this work was compared to LLNA (animal study), human cell line activation (h–CLAT), direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA), and KeratinoSens™, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) matched the categorization of LLNA in the following descending order: 96%, 92%, 82%, 70%, 70%, and 12%. With just an 8% mismatch with LLNA data, the EIS approach used in this study could be used as a screening tool for skin sensitizers. |
|---|