Cover Image

Recognizing design issues in process industry for safer design

In this study, accident cause analysis was used to generate a number of design failure elements (DFEs) that highlight the general classification of design errors. Then, a database of cases, suggesting design changes from unsafe to safe design, was compiled from journals, accident corrective action,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zakaria, Zafirah, Mahmud, Hafizah, Kidam, Kamarizan
Format: Article
Published: John Wiley and Sons Inc 2022
Subjects:
TP Chemical technology
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/103039/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202200027
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utm.103039
record_format eprints
spelling my.utm.1030392023-10-12T09:06:26Z http://eprints.utm.my/103039/ Recognizing design issues in process industry for safer design Zakaria, Zafirah Mahmud, Hafizah Kidam, Kamarizan TP Chemical technology In this study, accident cause analysis was used to generate a number of design failure elements (DFEs) that highlight the general classification of design errors. Then, a database of cases, suggesting design changes from unsafe to safe design, was compiled from journals, accident corrective action, and patents to identify the chemical industry design issues (DIs). The DIs were then classed under DFEs and into five main equipment categories, namely, reaction, separation, heat transfer, storage, and pipe and piping system. The database analysis reveals that the layout accounts for 17.4 % of DFEs, followed by equipment error (17.29 %) and reaction and reactive condition (16.86 %). For the equipment category, the reaction equipment had the highest DI which was related to the DFE of reaction and the reactive condition. John Wiley and Sons Inc 2022 Article PeerReviewed Zakaria, Zafirah and Mahmud, Hafizah and Kidam, Kamarizan (2022) Recognizing design issues in process industry for safer design. Chemical Engineering and Technology, 45 (10). pp. 1768-1776. ISSN 0930-7516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202200027 DOI : 10.1002/ceat.202200027
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
building UTM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
content_source UTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utm.my/
topic TP Chemical technology
spellingShingle TP Chemical technology
Zakaria, Zafirah
Mahmud, Hafizah
Kidam, Kamarizan
Recognizing design issues in process industry for safer design
description In this study, accident cause analysis was used to generate a number of design failure elements (DFEs) that highlight the general classification of design errors. Then, a database of cases, suggesting design changes from unsafe to safe design, was compiled from journals, accident corrective action, and patents to identify the chemical industry design issues (DIs). The DIs were then classed under DFEs and into five main equipment categories, namely, reaction, separation, heat transfer, storage, and pipe and piping system. The database analysis reveals that the layout accounts for 17.4 % of DFEs, followed by equipment error (17.29 %) and reaction and reactive condition (16.86 %). For the equipment category, the reaction equipment had the highest DI which was related to the DFE of reaction and the reactive condition.
format Article
author Zakaria, Zafirah
Mahmud, Hafizah
Kidam, Kamarizan
author_facet Zakaria, Zafirah
Mahmud, Hafizah
Kidam, Kamarizan
author_sort Zakaria, Zafirah
title Recognizing design issues in process industry for safer design
title_short Recognizing design issues in process industry for safer design
title_full Recognizing design issues in process industry for safer design
title_fullStr Recognizing design issues in process industry for safer design
title_full_unstemmed Recognizing design issues in process industry for safer design
title_sort recognizing design issues in process industry for safer design
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc
publishDate 2022
url http://eprints.utm.my/103039/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202200027
_version_ 1781777635816243200
score 13.211869

Similar Items