Transient removal of contaminant from a channel with differentially heated wall of cavity
Cleaning accumulated deposits inside pipe cavity are by disassembling and cleaning it part by part. Hydrodynamic cleaning of the cavity is an alternative method to clean accumulated deposits or contaminants inside the pipe cavity instead of dissembling them part by part is a tedious process or using...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/101462/1/AhmatRajabKhairulYusriMSKM2022.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/101462/ http://dms.library.utm.my:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:151545 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Cleaning accumulated deposits inside pipe cavity are by disassembling and cleaning it part by part. Hydrodynamic cleaning of the cavity is an alternative method to clean accumulated deposits or contaminants inside the pipe cavity instead of dissembling them part by part is a tedious process or using a solvent which is not suitable in the food processing industry. This study aims to investigate the contaminants removal process from a cavity by resorting to natural flow to clean the deposits in different cavity sizes and includes different heating locations with different flow configurations. An experimental method is used to visualize the flow behaviour inside the cavity of a channel at a large aspect ratio in isothermal conditions. These results are used to validate numerical results obtained in isothermal flow conditions. For numerical study, Constrained Interpolated Profile (CIP) method is used for the advection phase of momentum and energy equation, and central difference is used to solve the non-advection phase of momentum and energy equations. The numerical studies include different aspect ratios (AR), 1 to 4, various Reynolds numbers (Re), 50 to 1000, and different locations of the heated wall inside the cavity (left wall, bottom wall, & right wall) for three different Grashof numbers (Gr), 1000, 10 000, and 100 000. The particles removal percentage at the transient and steady states are then compared and discussed. A larger aspect ratio and a more significant Reynolds number for isothermal conditions will give a higher percentage of contaminants removal except for AR = 4 and Re = 50. This particular flow shows a higher percentage of contaminant removal than AR = 4; Re = 100, 200, and 400. For mixed convection flow, one typical result can be concluded: at small Gr, the contaminant removal percentage is not changing significantly for all different heated wall positions. It is also shown that a more significant aspect ratio will produce a better contaminant removal process, and a higher Grashof number will improve the contaminant removal process. It is also found that when Gr equals 1000 and 10000, there is no significant change in the contaminant removal process and constant heat flux from the bottom wall for Gr = 100,000 gives the highest contaminant removal percentage for every aspect ratio. The highest percentage removal of contaminant is 98.94% for Gr =100 000, AR=4. |
|---|