Cover Image

Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students

Educators Ishould Ibe Iconsidered Ithe Ilearning Istyle Iof Istudents Iso Ithat Ithe Ibest Ipractice Iapproach Ican Ibe Iapplied Iin Ilearning Iactivities. IAs Istudents Iunderstand Itheir Ilearning Istyle, Ithey Iwill Ibe Iable Ito Iintegrate Iit Iinto Itheir Ilearning Iprocess. IKolb ILearning ISt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohaffyza, Mimi, Md Yunos, Jailani, Yee, Mei Heong, Junita, Junita, Rizal, Fahmi, Ibrahim, Badaruddin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
L Education (General)
Online Access:http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/6273/1/J12880_84c814756d82a11d0379d733070ee52a.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/6273/
https://dx.doi.org/10.25046/aj060422
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uthm.eprints.6273
record_format eprints
spelling my.uthm.eprints.62732022-01-28T00:39:44Z http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/6273/ Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students Mohaffyza, Mimi Md Yunos, Jailani Yee, Mei Heong Junita, Junita Rizal, Fahmi Ibrahim, Badaruddin L Education (General) Educators Ishould Ibe Iconsidered Ithe Ilearning Istyle Iof Istudents Iso Ithat Ithe Ibest Ipractice Iapproach Ican Ibe Iapplied Iin Ilearning Iactivities. IAs Istudents Iunderstand Itheir Ilearning Istyle, Ithey Iwill Ibe Iable Ito Iintegrate Iit Iinto Itheir Ilearning Iprocess. IKolb ILearning IStyle Iwas Ithe Ilearning Istyle Ithat Iwas Iwidely Iused Ibased Ion Ithe Itheory Iof Ilearning Iexperiences. ITherefore, Ithis Istudy Iaimed Ito Idescribe Iengineering Iand Inon-engineering Istudents’ Ilearning Istyle. IThe Isurvey Iresearch Idesign Iwith Ia Iquantitative Iapproach Iwas Iapplied Iin Ithis Istudy. IA Itotal Iof I300 Irespondents Iwere Iselected Irandomly Ifrom Iall Ifaculties Iin IUniversiti ITun IHussein IOnn IMalaysia. IThe Isurvey Iquestionnaire Iconsisted Iof Itwo Imain Isections Irepresenting ILearning IGoals, ILearning IStyle, Iand ILearning IActivities. IThe Iresult Iexplains Ithat Iboth Iengineering Iand Inon-engineering Istudents Iare Imore Idominant Ito Iadopt Ithe IAccommodator Ilearning Istyle, followed Iby Ithe IConverger Ilearning Istyle, and Ithen IAssimilator Ilearning Istyle and IDiverger Ilearning Istyle. I IIt Iis Iconcluded Ithat Ithe Iengineering Iand Inon-engineering Istudents Iare Imore Iincline Ito Ibe Ia Ikinesthetic Ilearner. IThese Ilearning Ipreferences Iand Ilearning Istyles Iwill Icontribute Ito Itheir Iengagement Iin Ithe Iconcept Iof Ilearning and for educators to plan teaching strategies. 2021 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/6273/1/J12880_84c814756d82a11d0379d733070ee52a.pdf Mohaffyza, Mimi and Md Yunos, Jailani and Yee, Mei Heong and Junita, Junita and Rizal, Fahmi and Ibrahim, Badaruddin (2021) Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students. Advances Iin IScience, ITechnology Iand IEngineering ISystems IJournal, 6 (4). pp. 184-188. ISSN 2415-6698 https://dx.doi.org/10.25046/aj060422
institution Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
building UTHM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
content_source UTHM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/
language English
topic L Education (General)
spellingShingle L Education (General)
Mohaffyza, Mimi
Md Yunos, Jailani
Yee, Mei Heong
Junita, Junita
Rizal, Fahmi
Ibrahim, Badaruddin
Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students
description Educators Ishould Ibe Iconsidered Ithe Ilearning Istyle Iof Istudents Iso Ithat Ithe Ibest Ipractice Iapproach Ican Ibe Iapplied Iin Ilearning Iactivities. IAs Istudents Iunderstand Itheir Ilearning Istyle, Ithey Iwill Ibe Iable Ito Iintegrate Iit Iinto Itheir Ilearning Iprocess. IKolb ILearning IStyle Iwas Ithe Ilearning Istyle Ithat Iwas Iwidely Iused Ibased Ion Ithe Itheory Iof Ilearning Iexperiences. ITherefore, Ithis Istudy Iaimed Ito Idescribe Iengineering Iand Inon-engineering Istudents’ Ilearning Istyle. IThe Isurvey Iresearch Idesign Iwith Ia Iquantitative Iapproach Iwas Iapplied Iin Ithis Istudy. IA Itotal Iof I300 Irespondents Iwere Iselected Irandomly Ifrom Iall Ifaculties Iin IUniversiti ITun IHussein IOnn IMalaysia. IThe Isurvey Iquestionnaire Iconsisted Iof Itwo Imain Isections Irepresenting ILearning IGoals, ILearning IStyle, Iand ILearning IActivities. IThe Iresult Iexplains Ithat Iboth Iengineering Iand Inon-engineering Istudents Iare Imore Idominant Ito Iadopt Ithe IAccommodator Ilearning Istyle, followed Iby Ithe IConverger Ilearning Istyle, and Ithen IAssimilator Ilearning Istyle and IDiverger Ilearning Istyle. I IIt Iis Iconcluded Ithat Ithe Iengineering Iand Inon-engineering Istudents Iare Imore Iincline Ito Ibe Ia Ikinesthetic Ilearner. IThese Ilearning Ipreferences Iand Ilearning Istyles Iwill Icontribute Ito Itheir Iengagement Iin Ithe Iconcept Iof Ilearning and for educators to plan teaching strategies.
format Article
author Mohaffyza, Mimi
Md Yunos, Jailani
Yee, Mei Heong
Junita, Junita
Rizal, Fahmi
Ibrahim, Badaruddin
author_facet Mohaffyza, Mimi
Md Yunos, Jailani
Yee, Mei Heong
Junita, Junita
Rizal, Fahmi
Ibrahim, Badaruddin
author_sort Mohaffyza, Mimi
title Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students
title_short Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students
title_full Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students
title_fullStr Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students
title_sort comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students
publishDate 2021
url http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/6273/1/J12880_84c814756d82a11d0379d733070ee52a.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/6273/
https://dx.doi.org/10.25046/aj060422
_version_ 1738581471650643968
score 13.211869

Similar Items