Cover Image

Modelling and controller design for temperature control of power plant heat exchanger

Power Plant Heat exchanger is widely used in chemical and petroleum plants because it can sustain wide range of temperature and pressure. Heat exchanger is a high nonlinearity and poor dynamics plant; therefore it is complex to model and difficult to control its dynamics. In this paper two types of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A.A.Emhemed, Abdulrahman, Alsseid, Aleisawee, Hanafi, Dirman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Horizon Research Publishing 2017
Subjects:
TH7005-7699 Heating and ventilation. Air conditioning
TK1001-1841 Production of electric energy or power. Powerplants. Central stations
Online Access:http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/3643/1/AJ%202017%20%28511%29.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/3643/
http://dx.doi.org/10.13189/ujca.2017.050302
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uthm.eprints.3643
record_format eprints
spelling my.uthm.eprints.36432021-11-21T04:43:58Z http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/3643/ Modelling and controller design for temperature control of power plant heat exchanger A.A.Emhemed, Abdulrahman Alsseid, Aleisawee Hanafi, Dirman TH7005-7699 Heating and ventilation. Air conditioning TK1001-1841 Production of electric energy or power. Powerplants. Central stations Power Plant Heat exchanger is widely used in chemical and petroleum plants because it can sustain wide range of temperature and pressure. Heat exchanger is a high nonlinearity and poor dynamics plant; therefore it is complex to model and difficult to control its dynamics. In this paper two types of heat exchanger model and controller are applied for selecting suitable model and controller. First model is called (Physical model) and derived using real parameter of heat exchanger plant. Second, a Second Order Plus Dead Time (SOPDT model) that is derived from the response of heat exchanger. While the controllers are consisted of fuzzy proportional derivative (FPD) controller and proportional integral derivative (PID) controller and applied to the model and their responses are compared with the existing PID controller. The PID controller response based on Physical model gives similar response of existing PID controller based real heat exchanger plant in comparison with SOPDT model. That means the Physical model is able to represent the heat exchanger plant dynamics more accurately than SOPDT model. For the controller, the FPD control gives a slight enhancement based on SOPDT model. Therefore, FPD controller is more suitable than PID controlle Horizon Research Publishing 2017 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/3643/1/AJ%202017%20%28511%29.pdf A.A.Emhemed, Abdulrahman and Alsseid, Aleisawee and Hanafi, Dirman (2017) Modelling and controller design for temperature control of power plant heat exchanger. Universal Journal of Control and Automation, 5 (3). pp. 49-53. ISSN 2331-6500 http://dx.doi.org/10.13189/ujca.2017.050302
institution Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
building UTHM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
content_source UTHM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/
language English
topic TH7005-7699 Heating and ventilation. Air conditioning
TK1001-1841 Production of electric energy or power. Powerplants. Central stations
spellingShingle TH7005-7699 Heating and ventilation. Air conditioning
TK1001-1841 Production of electric energy or power. Powerplants. Central stations
A.A.Emhemed, Abdulrahman
Alsseid, Aleisawee
Hanafi, Dirman
Modelling and controller design for temperature control of power plant heat exchanger
description Power Plant Heat exchanger is widely used in chemical and petroleum plants because it can sustain wide range of temperature and pressure. Heat exchanger is a high nonlinearity and poor dynamics plant; therefore it is complex to model and difficult to control its dynamics. In this paper two types of heat exchanger model and controller are applied for selecting suitable model and controller. First model is called (Physical model) and derived using real parameter of heat exchanger plant. Second, a Second Order Plus Dead Time (SOPDT model) that is derived from the response of heat exchanger. While the controllers are consisted of fuzzy proportional derivative (FPD) controller and proportional integral derivative (PID) controller and applied to the model and their responses are compared with the existing PID controller. The PID controller response based on Physical model gives similar response of existing PID controller based real heat exchanger plant in comparison with SOPDT model. That means the Physical model is able to represent the heat exchanger plant dynamics more accurately than SOPDT model. For the controller, the FPD control gives a slight enhancement based on SOPDT model. Therefore, FPD controller is more suitable than PID controlle
format Article
author A.A.Emhemed, Abdulrahman
Alsseid, Aleisawee
Hanafi, Dirman
author_facet A.A.Emhemed, Abdulrahman
Alsseid, Aleisawee
Hanafi, Dirman
author_sort A.A.Emhemed, Abdulrahman
title Modelling and controller design for temperature control of power plant heat exchanger
title_short Modelling and controller design for temperature control of power plant heat exchanger
title_full Modelling and controller design for temperature control of power plant heat exchanger
title_fullStr Modelling and controller design for temperature control of power plant heat exchanger
title_full_unstemmed Modelling and controller design for temperature control of power plant heat exchanger
title_sort modelling and controller design for temperature control of power plant heat exchanger
publisher Horizon Research Publishing
publishDate 2017
url http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/3643/1/AJ%202017%20%28511%29.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/3643/
http://dx.doi.org/10.13189/ujca.2017.050302
_version_ 1738581150105862144
score 13.211869

Similar Items