Performance and Emissions of 1.3L and 1.6L Engines Fueled with Gasoline and CNG at Several Vehicle Speeds

The main objective of this work was to investigate a comparison between engine performance and exhaust emissions for 1.3L and 1.6L 4-cylinder engines fueled with gasoline or compressed natural gas (CNG). The test engines were fitted with the same CNG conversion kit, which operated with either gasoli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarwani, Muhamad Khairul Ilman, Fawzi, Mas, Mokhtar, Muhamad Hanif, Osman, Shahrul Azmir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Mattingley Publishing Co., Inc. 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1185/1/J11947_3af8043f625d50c199d6868bdd580e78.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1185/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uthm.eprints.1185
record_format eprints
spelling my.uthm.eprints.11852022-08-03T03:03:03Z http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1185/ Performance and Emissions of 1.3L and 1.6L Engines Fueled with Gasoline and CNG at Several Vehicle Speeds Sarwani, Muhamad Khairul Ilman Fawzi, Mas Mokhtar, Muhamad Hanif Osman, Shahrul Azmir T Technology (General) The main objective of this work was to investigate a comparison between engine performance and exhaust emissions for 1.3L and 1.6L 4-cylinder engines fueled with gasoline or compressed natural gas (CNG). The test engines were fitted with the same CNG conversion kit, which operated with either gasoline or CNG. The engine performance and exhaust emissions were measured over vehicle speeds at 30 km/h, 50 km/h, 70 km/h, 90 km/h, and 100 km/h, with half throttle valve position. The results showed that brake powers decreased at an average of 25.18% and 33.94% when using CNG fuel. There is also a reduction in brake specific energy consumptions at an average of 17.25% for 1.3L engines. However, there is an increment of brake specific energy consumption at a lower speed for 1.6L engine fueled with CNG. The 1.3L engine produces higher exhaust gas temperatures at an average of 5.14% when running on CNG. The exhaust emissions of the 1.6L engine fueled with CNG showed higher HC, CO, O2, NOx and lower CO2 compared to the 1.3L engine fueled with the same fuel. The Mattingley Publishing Co., Inc. 2020 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1185/1/J11947_3af8043f625d50c199d6868bdd580e78.pdf Sarwani, Muhamad Khairul Ilman and Fawzi, Mas and Mokhtar, Muhamad Hanif and Osman, Shahrul Azmir (2020) Performance and Emissions of 1.3L and 1.6L Engines Fueled with Gasoline and CNG at Several Vehicle Speeds. TEST Engineering & Management, 83. pp. 29133-29141. ISSN 0193-4120
institution Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
building UTHM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
content_source UTHM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/
language English
topic T Technology (General)
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
Sarwani, Muhamad Khairul Ilman
Fawzi, Mas
Mokhtar, Muhamad Hanif
Osman, Shahrul Azmir
Performance and Emissions of 1.3L and 1.6L Engines Fueled with Gasoline and CNG at Several Vehicle Speeds
description The main objective of this work was to investigate a comparison between engine performance and exhaust emissions for 1.3L and 1.6L 4-cylinder engines fueled with gasoline or compressed natural gas (CNG). The test engines were fitted with the same CNG conversion kit, which operated with either gasoline or CNG. The engine performance and exhaust emissions were measured over vehicle speeds at 30 km/h, 50 km/h, 70 km/h, 90 km/h, and 100 km/h, with half throttle valve position. The results showed that brake powers decreased at an average of 25.18% and 33.94% when using CNG fuel. There is also a reduction in brake specific energy consumptions at an average of 17.25% for 1.3L engines. However, there is an increment of brake specific energy consumption at a lower speed for 1.6L engine fueled with CNG. The 1.3L engine produces higher exhaust gas temperatures at an average of 5.14% when running on CNG. The exhaust emissions of the 1.6L engine fueled with CNG showed higher HC, CO, O2, NOx and lower CO2 compared to the 1.3L engine fueled with the same fuel.
format Article
author Sarwani, Muhamad Khairul Ilman
Fawzi, Mas
Mokhtar, Muhamad Hanif
Osman, Shahrul Azmir
author_facet Sarwani, Muhamad Khairul Ilman
Fawzi, Mas
Mokhtar, Muhamad Hanif
Osman, Shahrul Azmir
author_sort Sarwani, Muhamad Khairul Ilman
title Performance and Emissions of 1.3L and 1.6L Engines Fueled with Gasoline and CNG at Several Vehicle Speeds
title_short Performance and Emissions of 1.3L and 1.6L Engines Fueled with Gasoline and CNG at Several Vehicle Speeds
title_full Performance and Emissions of 1.3L and 1.6L Engines Fueled with Gasoline and CNG at Several Vehicle Speeds
title_fullStr Performance and Emissions of 1.3L and 1.6L Engines Fueled with Gasoline and CNG at Several Vehicle Speeds
title_full_unstemmed Performance and Emissions of 1.3L and 1.6L Engines Fueled with Gasoline and CNG at Several Vehicle Speeds
title_sort performance and emissions of 1.3l and 1.6l engines fueled with gasoline and cng at several vehicle speeds
publisher The Mattingley Publishing Co., Inc.
publishDate 2020
url http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1185/1/J11947_3af8043f625d50c199d6868bdd580e78.pdf
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/1185/
_version_ 1740827703273062400
score 13.222552