Cover Image

A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system

Optimal placement and sizing of Distributed Generation (DG) are essential for future power planning of distribution networks. The performance of Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) and an Improved version of Gravitational Search Algorithm (IGSA) are compared in solving the optimization problem. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khatib, Tamer, Bujal, Noor Ropidah, Sulaiman, Marizan, Abdul Kadir, Aida Fazliana, El Tawil, Naji Ammar Mansour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers 2021
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/2/BUJAL2021.PDF
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42835-021-00829-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utem.eprints.25614
record_format eprints
spelling my.utem.eprints.256142023-07-07T11:21:40Z http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/ A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system Khatib, Tamer Bujal, Noor Ropidah Sulaiman, Marizan Abdul Kadir, Aida Fazliana El Tawil, Naji Ammar Mansour Optimal placement and sizing of Distributed Generation (DG) are essential for future power planning of distribution networks. The performance of Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) and an Improved version of Gravitational Search Algorithm (IGSA) are compared in solving the optimization problem. The multi-objective function optimization includes power loss minimization (Ploss), Minimum bus voltage (Vbusmin), and an average voltage total harmonic distortion (THDv) are considered in this optimization problem and the IEEE 13-bus and IEEE 69-bus radial distribution network were applied on this study. The benefits due to the optimal placement and sizing of DG include power loss reduction, minimization of total harmonic distortion, and improvement of bus voltages, especially the weakest bus in the distribution network. The impact of DG installation at the proposed location with the proposed sizing on voltage stability margin also presented. The results show the Voltage Stability Margin (VSM) for both real power (P) and reactive power (Q) at the weakest bus after DG have improvement with present of DG. Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers 2021-11 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/2/BUJAL2021.PDF Khatib, Tamer and Bujal, Noor Ropidah and Sulaiman, Marizan and Abdul Kadir, Aida Fazliana and El Tawil, Naji Ammar Mansour (2021) A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system. Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology, 16 (6). pp. 2949-2966. ISSN 1975-0102 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42835-021-00829-y 10.1007/s42835-021-00829-y
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
building UTEM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
content_source UTEM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utem.edu.my/
language English
description Optimal placement and sizing of Distributed Generation (DG) are essential for future power planning of distribution networks. The performance of Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) and an Improved version of Gravitational Search Algorithm (IGSA) are compared in solving the optimization problem. The multi-objective function optimization includes power loss minimization (Ploss), Minimum bus voltage (Vbusmin), and an average voltage total harmonic distortion (THDv) are considered in this optimization problem and the IEEE 13-bus and IEEE 69-bus radial distribution network were applied on this study. The benefits due to the optimal placement and sizing of DG include power loss reduction, minimization of total harmonic distortion, and improvement of bus voltages, especially the weakest bus in the distribution network. The impact of DG installation at the proposed location with the proposed sizing on voltage stability margin also presented. The results show the Voltage Stability Margin (VSM) for both real power (P) and reactive power (Q) at the weakest bus after DG have improvement with present of DG.
format Article
author Khatib, Tamer
Bujal, Noor Ropidah
Sulaiman, Marizan
Abdul Kadir, Aida Fazliana
El Tawil, Naji Ammar Mansour
spellingShingle Khatib, Tamer
Bujal, Noor Ropidah
Sulaiman, Marizan
Abdul Kadir, Aida Fazliana
El Tawil, Naji Ammar Mansour
A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system
author_facet Khatib, Tamer
Bujal, Noor Ropidah
Sulaiman, Marizan
Abdul Kadir, Aida Fazliana
El Tawil, Naji Ammar Mansour
author_sort Khatib, Tamer
title A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system
title_short A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system
title_full A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system
title_fullStr A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between GSA and IGSA for optimal allocation and sizing of DG and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system
title_sort comparison between gsa and igsa for optimal allocation and sizing of dg and impact to voltage stability margin in electrical distribution system
publisher Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
publishDate 2021
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/2/BUJAL2021.PDF
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25614/
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42835-021-00829-y
_version_ 1772816022454140928
score 13.211869

Similar Items