Cover Image

Evaluation of high-dose rate (HDR) radiobiologic dose-equivalent web tool for cervical cancer

Following successful precision and timing accuracy phases, the next step is a comprehensive evaluation of the web application versus the Microsoft Excel template. Testing with clinical data ensures robustness. Documentation and training for medical physicists are essential. Implementation will start...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shafizan, Haziq Asyraaf
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
R Medicine
RC254-282 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer)
RC870-923 Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology
Online Access:http://eprints.usm.my/61333/1/Haziq%20Asyraaf%20Shafizan-E.pdf
http://eprints.usm.my/61333/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.usm.eprints.61333
record_format eprints
spelling my.usm.eprints.61333 http://eprints.usm.my/61333/ Evaluation of high-dose rate (HDR) radiobiologic dose-equivalent web tool for cervical cancer Shafizan, Haziq Asyraaf R Medicine RC254-282 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer) RC870-923 Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology Following successful precision and timing accuracy phases, the next step is a comprehensive evaluation of the web application versus the Microsoft Excel template. Testing with clinical data ensures robustness. Documentation and training for medical physicists are essential. Implementation will start with a pilot group, followed by full-scale deployment. Evaluation of BED and EQD2 values reveals minimal deviations, indicating high comparability. For target tissue, BED deviation is 0.048% and EQD2 is 0.008%. The bladder shows a BED deviation of 0.055% and EQD2 of 0.073%. The rectum has a BED deviation of 0.014% and EQD2 of 0.029%. For the sigmoid, the BED deviation is 0.035% and EQD2 is 0.142%. All deviations are within the 3% tolerance limit. The web application completes the full treatment in 138.69 seconds, compared to 202.67 seconds for Excel, with a TER of 1.46. For the first additional patient, the web application takes 96.84 seconds, while Excel takes 107.11 seconds, giving a TER of 1.11. For the second additional patient, the web application takes 94.77 seconds versus 78.66 seconds for Excel, with a TER of 0.83. Despite occasional exceptions, the web application is generally more time-efficient and reliable. 2024-07 Thesis NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/61333/1/Haziq%20Asyraaf%20Shafizan-E.pdf Shafizan, Haziq Asyraaf (2024) Evaluation of high-dose rate (HDR) radiobiologic dose-equivalent web tool for cervical cancer. Masters thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
building Hamzah Sendut Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Sains Malaysia
content_source USM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.usm.my/
language English
topic R Medicine
RC254-282 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer)
RC870-923 Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology
spellingShingle R Medicine
RC254-282 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer)
RC870-923 Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology
Shafizan, Haziq Asyraaf
Evaluation of high-dose rate (HDR) radiobiologic dose-equivalent web tool for cervical cancer
description Following successful precision and timing accuracy phases, the next step is a comprehensive evaluation of the web application versus the Microsoft Excel template. Testing with clinical data ensures robustness. Documentation and training for medical physicists are essential. Implementation will start with a pilot group, followed by full-scale deployment. Evaluation of BED and EQD2 values reveals minimal deviations, indicating high comparability. For target tissue, BED deviation is 0.048% and EQD2 is 0.008%. The bladder shows a BED deviation of 0.055% and EQD2 of 0.073%. The rectum has a BED deviation of 0.014% and EQD2 of 0.029%. For the sigmoid, the BED deviation is 0.035% and EQD2 is 0.142%. All deviations are within the 3% tolerance limit. The web application completes the full treatment in 138.69 seconds, compared to 202.67 seconds for Excel, with a TER of 1.46. For the first additional patient, the web application takes 96.84 seconds, while Excel takes 107.11 seconds, giving a TER of 1.11. For the second additional patient, the web application takes 94.77 seconds versus 78.66 seconds for Excel, with a TER of 0.83. Despite occasional exceptions, the web application is generally more time-efficient and reliable.
format Thesis
author Shafizan, Haziq Asyraaf
author_facet Shafizan, Haziq Asyraaf
author_sort Shafizan, Haziq Asyraaf
title Evaluation of high-dose rate (HDR) radiobiologic dose-equivalent web tool for cervical cancer
title_short Evaluation of high-dose rate (HDR) radiobiologic dose-equivalent web tool for cervical cancer
title_full Evaluation of high-dose rate (HDR) radiobiologic dose-equivalent web tool for cervical cancer
title_fullStr Evaluation of high-dose rate (HDR) radiobiologic dose-equivalent web tool for cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of high-dose rate (HDR) radiobiologic dose-equivalent web tool for cervical cancer
title_sort evaluation of high-dose rate (hdr) radiobiologic dose-equivalent web tool for cervical cancer
publishDate 2024
url http://eprints.usm.my/61333/1/Haziq%20Asyraaf%20Shafizan-E.pdf
http://eprints.usm.my/61333/
_version_ 1816131400669069312
score 13.23648

Similar Items