A study on the effect of game base balance training and gender difference on attention and memory by eye tracking method
Game base balance training was shown to be effective in improving cognition as more cognitive resources can be allocated to deal with cognitive tasks due to improve balance ability. In addition, there is gender difference in cognitive performances. Thus, in this study, game base balance training...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.usm.my/53907/1/Tan%20Wei%20Ting-24%20pages.pdf http://eprints.usm.my/53907/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Game base balance training was shown to be effective in improving cognition as more
cognitive resources can be allocated to deal with cognitive tasks due to improve balance ability.
In addition, there is gender difference in cognitive performances. Thus, in this study, game
base balance training was conducted to examine its effect on improving visual attention and
working memory among healthy male and female university students. The aim of this study is
to investigate the effect of balance training and gender difference on visual attention and
working memory performances. This study is an interventional study with randomized
controlled trial. The target population is students from University Sains Malaysia, Kubang
Kerian who fulfil the subject criteria and pass the screening tests. There were three screening
tests which were the Ishihara Color Blindness Test, Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire
(PAR-Q) and Balance Performance Assessment from Fitness Balance Board (FIBOD). The
sample size is 48 participants. As this study is also interested in gender differences in cognition,
an equal number of male and female was recruited and randomly assigned to either the
experimental or control group. The intervention was carried out using FIBOD with Space
Shooter. Pre and post-tests included Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) to measure balance
ability; Visual Search Task to measure attention; and Mnemonic Similarity Task to measure
memory. The two cognitive assessments were conducted with eye tracking. The control group
only underwent the pre and post assessments and was refrained from doing other balance
training. Other than the pre and post assessments, the experimental group also underwent the
intervention for one month, with three 15-minutes sessions in a week. To analyse the data, SMI BeGaze and Statistical Package for Social Sciences were used. The statistical test used to
analyse the collected data was Repeated Measures ANOVA. There were two outcome
measures in each cognitive tests, response time and accuracy. For visual attention, there was a
significant interaction effect in response time between the two groups from pre to post
assessment, F (1, 46) = 16.80, p < .014, ηp2 = .268. As for the accuracy in visual attention, there
was a significant interaction effect, F (1, 46) = 20.47, p < .000, ηp2 = .308. To compare visual
attention between gender, there were no significant difference in response time F (1, 46) = 1.64,
p = .213, ηp2 = .069 as well as in accuracy F (1, 46) = 0.11, p = .745, ηp2 = .005 between gender
from pre to post assessments. For working memory, there is no significant interaction effect in
response time F (1, 46) = 2.01, p = .163, ηp2 = .042 and accuracy F (1, 46) = 0.06, p = .805, ηp2
= .001 between the two groups from pre to post assessments. To compare working memory
between gender, there were no significant difference in response time F (1, 46) = 0.81, p = .378,
ηp2 = .035 as well as in accuracy F (1, 46) = 2.79, p = .109, ηp2 = .112 between gender from pre
to post assessments. Game base balance training used in this study was able to improve
cognitive performances among healthy university students. The experimental group showed
improved performance in visual attention and working memory between pre and post
assessments. Yet, the experimental group only performed better than the control group in the
visual attention task but in not the working memory task. No significant gender differences
were found in both visual attention and working memory performances after the intervention. |
|---|