Choice Of National Strategy And Industrial Organization Comparing Airframe Production Between Brazil And Japan
This paper examines two reasons why the development of airframes as a national aircraft industry1 have been met with more success in Brazil than in Japan: First, Brazil's aircraft industry was nurtured by a unified government administrative structure while in Japan the same industry instead...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM Press)
2006
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.usm.my/40228/1/takashi.pdf http://eprints.usm.my/40228/ http://ijaps.usm.my/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/takashi.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.usm.eprints.40228 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.usm.eprints.40228 http://eprints.usm.my/40228/ Choice Of National Strategy And Industrial Organization Comparing Airframe Production Between Brazil And Japan Kanatsu, Takashi P1-1091 Philology. Linguistics(General) This paper examines two reasons why the development of airframes as a national aircraft industry1 have been met with more success in Brazil than in Japan: First, Brazil's aircraft industry was nurtured by a unified government administrative structure while in Japan the same industry instead became a victim of inter-ministerial battles. Second, the Brazilian government nurtured a single specialized national-champion firm, Embraer (Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica S.A.)2, while the Japanese government relied on the traditional consortium approach that epitomizes most Japanese postWorld War II industrial ventures. While usually successful, the consortium approach did not do as well to build a domestic aircraft industry in Japan. Making airplanes turned out to be an exception in Japanese business partly also because of the involvement of several government agencies at varying levels. In other Japanese industries, such as steel, semiconductors, and computers, a single ministry, the Ministry of International Trade and Industries (MITI) had managed these consortiums relatively successfully. Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM Press) 2006 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/40228/1/takashi.pdf Kanatsu, Takashi (2006) Choice Of National Strategy And Industrial Organization Comparing Airframe Production Between Brazil And Japan. International Journal of Asia Pacific Studies (IJAPS), 2 (1). pp. 1-27. ISSN ISSN: 1823-6243 http://ijaps.usm.my/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/takashi.pdf |
institution |
Universiti Sains Malaysia |
building |
Hamzah Sendut Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Sains Malaysia |
content_source |
USM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.usm.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
P1-1091 Philology. Linguistics(General) |
spellingShingle |
P1-1091 Philology. Linguistics(General) Kanatsu, Takashi Choice Of National Strategy And Industrial Organization Comparing Airframe Production Between Brazil And Japan |
description |
This paper examines two reasons why the development of airframes as a
national aircraft industry1 have been met with more success in Brazil than in
Japan: First, Brazil's aircraft industry was nurtured by a unified government
administrative structure while in Japan the same industry instead became a
victim of inter-ministerial battles. Second, the Brazilian government
nurtured a single specialized national-champion firm, Embraer (Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronáutica S.A.)2, while the Japanese government relied on
the traditional consortium approach that epitomizes most Japanese postWorld War II industrial ventures. While usually successful, the consortium
approach did not do as well to build a domestic aircraft industry in Japan.
Making airplanes turned out to be an exception in Japanese business partly
also because of the involvement of several government agencies at varying
levels. In other Japanese industries, such as steel, semiconductors, and
computers, a single ministry, the Ministry of International Trade and
Industries (MITI) had managed these consortiums relatively successfully. |
format |
Article |
author |
Kanatsu, Takashi |
author_facet |
Kanatsu, Takashi |
author_sort |
Kanatsu, Takashi |
title |
Choice Of National Strategy And Industrial
Organization Comparing Airframe
Production Between Brazil And Japan |
title_short |
Choice Of National Strategy And Industrial
Organization Comparing Airframe
Production Between Brazil And Japan |
title_full |
Choice Of National Strategy And Industrial
Organization Comparing Airframe
Production Between Brazil And Japan |
title_fullStr |
Choice Of National Strategy And Industrial
Organization Comparing Airframe
Production Between Brazil And Japan |
title_full_unstemmed |
Choice Of National Strategy And Industrial
Organization Comparing Airframe
Production Between Brazil And Japan |
title_sort |
choice of national strategy and industrial
organization comparing airframe
production between brazil and japan |
publisher |
Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM Press) |
publishDate |
2006 |
url |
http://eprints.usm.my/40228/1/takashi.pdf http://eprints.usm.my/40228/ http://ijaps.usm.my/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/takashi.pdf |
_version_ |
1643709882255278080 |
score |
13.211869 |