Cover Image

Comparison of maturity models

Maturity models are one of the widespread areas in the field of improving organizational performance. Maturity models identify organizational strengths and weaknesses in addition to providing benchmarking information. Project management maturity models are important assessment tools for the profe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khoshgoftar, Mohammad, Osman, Omar
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2008
Subjects:
TH1-9745 Building construction
Online Access:http://eprints.usm.my/34679/1/HBP20.pdf
http://eprints.usm.my/34679/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.usm.eprints.34679
record_format eprints
spelling my.usm.eprints.34679 http://eprints.usm.my/34679/ Comparison of maturity models Khoshgoftar, Mohammad Osman, Omar TH1-9745 Building construction Maturity models are one of the widespread areas in the field of improving organizational performance. Maturity models identify organizational strengths and weaknesses in addition to providing benchmarking information. Project management maturity models are important assessment tools for the profession. Companies assess their organizational performance and identify their weaknesses and strengths in terms of their needs and objectives and also characteristics of the models. The important issue here is that construction companies can assess their organizational performance by a comprehensive and useful model. This can help them compare their situation with other companies by using the same model. There are many maturity models like OPM3, P-CMM, CMMI, OPMMM, TMM, P3M3, SPICE, BPMM, FAAiCMM, (PM)2, Kerzner’s Project Management Maturity Model, Ibbs and Kwak Maturity Model, RMMM, TMM, etc. The aim of this study is to find out the best maturity model for using in construction companies. We will discuss four maturity models (OPM3, Prince, CMMI, and BPMM) and compare them in terms of variables such as: Publisher, Project Manager, Scope, Number of Maturity Levels, Date of Issue, Detail, Definition of Maturity, Culture, Referring to Standard, Discrete and Continues, Assessment difficulty, Assessment cost, Quantitative Results, Tangible of Result, Identifying weakness and Strong points, Continues Assessment, Training, Flexibility, Organization Strategic, Acceptability of Model, Simple and Understandable, Easy for Execution. The result will show that OPM3 is the best maturity model among four maturity model considered. 2008-12 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/34679/1/HBP20.pdf Khoshgoftar, Mohammad and Osman, Omar (2008) Comparison of maturity models. In: 2nd International Conference on Built Environment in Developing Countries., 3rd- 4th December 2008, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
building Hamzah Sendut Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Sains Malaysia
content_source USM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.usm.my/
language English
topic TH1-9745 Building construction
spellingShingle TH1-9745 Building construction
Khoshgoftar, Mohammad
Osman, Omar
Comparison of maturity models
description Maturity models are one of the widespread areas in the field of improving organizational performance. Maturity models identify organizational strengths and weaknesses in addition to providing benchmarking information. Project management maturity models are important assessment tools for the profession. Companies assess their organizational performance and identify their weaknesses and strengths in terms of their needs and objectives and also characteristics of the models. The important issue here is that construction companies can assess their organizational performance by a comprehensive and useful model. This can help them compare their situation with other companies by using the same model. There are many maturity models like OPM3, P-CMM, CMMI, OPMMM, TMM, P3M3, SPICE, BPMM, FAAiCMM, (PM)2, Kerzner’s Project Management Maturity Model, Ibbs and Kwak Maturity Model, RMMM, TMM, etc. The aim of this study is to find out the best maturity model for using in construction companies. We will discuss four maturity models (OPM3, Prince, CMMI, and BPMM) and compare them in terms of variables such as: Publisher, Project Manager, Scope, Number of Maturity Levels, Date of Issue, Detail, Definition of Maturity, Culture, Referring to Standard, Discrete and Continues, Assessment difficulty, Assessment cost, Quantitative Results, Tangible of Result, Identifying weakness and Strong points, Continues Assessment, Training, Flexibility, Organization Strategic, Acceptability of Model, Simple and Understandable, Easy for Execution. The result will show that OPM3 is the best maturity model among four maturity model considered.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Khoshgoftar, Mohammad
Osman, Omar
author_facet Khoshgoftar, Mohammad
Osman, Omar
author_sort Khoshgoftar, Mohammad
title Comparison of maturity models
title_short Comparison of maturity models
title_full Comparison of maturity models
title_fullStr Comparison of maturity models
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of maturity models
title_sort comparison of maturity models
publishDate 2008
url http://eprints.usm.my/34679/1/HBP20.pdf
http://eprints.usm.my/34679/
_version_ 1643708276947288064
score 13.211869

Similar Items