Comparison of the physical properties between Malaysian and Thai rice

Rice is a staple food in the world market, especially in the Asian region. In each country, rice characteristicswill differin terms of shape, grade,and size. Thailand is one of the exporters in the global market rice among Asia South countries. Numerous studies have been done on different va...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sathongpan, Parichart, Shamsudin, Rosnah, Varith, Jaturapatr, Abd Rahman, Nur Farhana
Format: Article
Published: HH Publisher 2021
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/96478/
https://journals.hh-publisher.com/index.php/AAFRJ/article/view/240/251
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.96478
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.964782023-01-11T09:08:19Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/96478/ Comparison of the physical properties between Malaysian and Thai rice Sathongpan, Parichart Shamsudin, Rosnah Varith, Jaturapatr Abd Rahman, Nur Farhana Rice is a staple food in the world market, especially in the Asian region. In each country, rice characteristicswill differin terms of shape, grade,and size. Thailand is one of the exporters in the global market rice among Asia South countries. Numerous studies have been done on different varieties ofwhite and brown rice. However, research on physicochemical properties of different origin of white rice varieties is still limited,particularly between Malaysian and Thai rice. Therefore, it is essentialto compare rice cultivars based on origin. This research aimedto evaluate the differences inphysicochemical properties and improve Malaysian and Thai rice.Onekilogram of Malaysian and Thai rice wasprocessed into powder by way of grinding andthen prepared for physicochemical measurement by sieving the produced rice powders with a size of 2 mm to get rid of foreign objects. The physical parameters measured were length, width, length/breadth ratio, thickness, density, grain shape, surface area, bulk density, actualdensity, porosity, sphericity, aspect ratio, thousand weight kernels angle of repose, colour (L, a*, b*) and hardness. The results of the study showed no significant differences (p>0.05) interms of length, width, length/breadth ratio, actualdensity, porosity, sphericity, aspect ratio, angle of repose, Lightness (L) and b*. However, there is a significant variation (p < 0.05) between Malaysian and Thai rice in terms of thickness, surface area, bulk density, thousand weight kernels, colour (a*),and hardness parameters. The evaluation of the quality of Malaysian and Thai rice can be a guide or reference for the grading and sorting processing sectors according to consumers' preferences, respectively. HH Publisher 2021 Article PeerReviewed Sathongpan, Parichart and Shamsudin, Rosnah and Varith, Jaturapatr and Abd Rahman, Nur Farhana (2021) Comparison of the physical properties between Malaysian and Thai rice. Advances in Agricultural and Food Research Journal, 2 (1). pp. 1-14. ISSN 2735-1084 https://journals.hh-publisher.com/index.php/AAFRJ/article/view/240/251 10.36877/aafrj.a0000177
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
description Rice is a staple food in the world market, especially in the Asian region. In each country, rice characteristicswill differin terms of shape, grade,and size. Thailand is one of the exporters in the global market rice among Asia South countries. Numerous studies have been done on different varieties ofwhite and brown rice. However, research on physicochemical properties of different origin of white rice varieties is still limited,particularly between Malaysian and Thai rice. Therefore, it is essentialto compare rice cultivars based on origin. This research aimedto evaluate the differences inphysicochemical properties and improve Malaysian and Thai rice.Onekilogram of Malaysian and Thai rice wasprocessed into powder by way of grinding andthen prepared for physicochemical measurement by sieving the produced rice powders with a size of 2 mm to get rid of foreign objects. The physical parameters measured were length, width, length/breadth ratio, thickness, density, grain shape, surface area, bulk density, actualdensity, porosity, sphericity, aspect ratio, thousand weight kernels angle of repose, colour (L, a*, b*) and hardness. The results of the study showed no significant differences (p>0.05) interms of length, width, length/breadth ratio, actualdensity, porosity, sphericity, aspect ratio, angle of repose, Lightness (L) and b*. However, there is a significant variation (p < 0.05) between Malaysian and Thai rice in terms of thickness, surface area, bulk density, thousand weight kernels, colour (a*),and hardness parameters. The evaluation of the quality of Malaysian and Thai rice can be a guide or reference for the grading and sorting processing sectors according to consumers' preferences, respectively.
format Article
author Sathongpan, Parichart
Shamsudin, Rosnah
Varith, Jaturapatr
Abd Rahman, Nur Farhana
spellingShingle Sathongpan, Parichart
Shamsudin, Rosnah
Varith, Jaturapatr
Abd Rahman, Nur Farhana
Comparison of the physical properties between Malaysian and Thai rice
author_facet Sathongpan, Parichart
Shamsudin, Rosnah
Varith, Jaturapatr
Abd Rahman, Nur Farhana
author_sort Sathongpan, Parichart
title Comparison of the physical properties between Malaysian and Thai rice
title_short Comparison of the physical properties between Malaysian and Thai rice
title_full Comparison of the physical properties between Malaysian and Thai rice
title_fullStr Comparison of the physical properties between Malaysian and Thai rice
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the physical properties between Malaysian and Thai rice
title_sort comparison of the physical properties between malaysian and thai rice
publisher HH Publisher
publishDate 2021
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/96478/
https://journals.hh-publisher.com/index.php/AAFRJ/article/view/240/251
_version_ 1755873906034475008
score 13.211869