Types and cognitive levels of questions asked by secondary agricultural science teachers

Higher level cognitive questions such as open-ended and rhetorical questions aid teachers in exploring students’ ideas (Ewing, 2006). Asking a wider range of questions requires students to analyze, evaluate, and develop conceptual and procedural knowledge (Tofade et al., 2013). The purpose of this s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdul Latir, Siti Shuhaidah, Whittington, M. Susie
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia 2019
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/76815/1/ICERP_2019-20.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/76815/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.76815
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.768152020-02-06T01:31:16Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/76815/ Types and cognitive levels of questions asked by secondary agricultural science teachers Abdul Latir, Siti Shuhaidah Whittington, M. Susie Higher level cognitive questions such as open-ended and rhetorical questions aid teachers in exploring students’ ideas (Ewing, 2006). Asking a wider range of questions requires students to analyze, evaluate, and develop conceptual and procedural knowledge (Tofade et al., 2013). The purpose of this study was to identify the types and cognitive levels of questions used by first-time secondary agricultural science teachers in the Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education (CASE) program in Ohio. Participants in this study implemented inquiry-based instructional approaches in their classrooms and the researchers intended to describe the type and cognitive level of questions the teachers asked. Teachers’ questions were categorized by type and cognitive level. Question types were categorized using the Teacher Question Type Frequency Form. Question types described in this study include open, closed, managerial, and rhetorical questions. The cognitive level of questions was categorized using Bloom’s Taxonomy (Bloom et al., 1956), which includes the categories of knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Closed-type questions were found to be the most common (37%) type of questions asked by participating teachers during implementation of inquiry-based instructional techniques. Meanwhile, nearly 59 percent of the questions asked by teachers were at the lowest cognitive level (knowledge level) of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Secondary agricultural science teachers asked mostly closed-type questions during their implementation of inquiry-based instruction, while analysis-level questions were the least utilized category (9.33%). Overall, teachers asked a limited number of higher cognitive level questions during observed class sessions. Secondary agricultural science teachers are recommended to consider the cognition level of questions they develop for classroom discussion. Teachers should also consider student needs and prior knowledge when formulating questions and learning objectives. When teachers understand and apply the best strategies of questioning to their teaching, students will learn at higher levels of thought. Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia 2019 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/76815/1/ICERP_2019-20.pdf Abdul Latir, Siti Shuhaidah and Whittington, M. Susie (2019) Types and cognitive levels of questions asked by secondary agricultural science teachers. In: 5th International Conference on Educational Research and Practice (ICERP) 2019, 22-23 Oct. 2019, Palm Garden Hotel, Putrajaya, Malaysia. (pp. 258-264).
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description Higher level cognitive questions such as open-ended and rhetorical questions aid teachers in exploring students’ ideas (Ewing, 2006). Asking a wider range of questions requires students to analyze, evaluate, and develop conceptual and procedural knowledge (Tofade et al., 2013). The purpose of this study was to identify the types and cognitive levels of questions used by first-time secondary agricultural science teachers in the Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education (CASE) program in Ohio. Participants in this study implemented inquiry-based instructional approaches in their classrooms and the researchers intended to describe the type and cognitive level of questions the teachers asked. Teachers’ questions were categorized by type and cognitive level. Question types were categorized using the Teacher Question Type Frequency Form. Question types described in this study include open, closed, managerial, and rhetorical questions. The cognitive level of questions was categorized using Bloom’s Taxonomy (Bloom et al., 1956), which includes the categories of knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Closed-type questions were found to be the most common (37%) type of questions asked by participating teachers during implementation of inquiry-based instructional techniques. Meanwhile, nearly 59 percent of the questions asked by teachers were at the lowest cognitive level (knowledge level) of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Secondary agricultural science teachers asked mostly closed-type questions during their implementation of inquiry-based instruction, while analysis-level questions were the least utilized category (9.33%). Overall, teachers asked a limited number of higher cognitive level questions during observed class sessions. Secondary agricultural science teachers are recommended to consider the cognition level of questions they develop for classroom discussion. Teachers should also consider student needs and prior knowledge when formulating questions and learning objectives. When teachers understand and apply the best strategies of questioning to their teaching, students will learn at higher levels of thought.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Abdul Latir, Siti Shuhaidah
Whittington, M. Susie
spellingShingle Abdul Latir, Siti Shuhaidah
Whittington, M. Susie
Types and cognitive levels of questions asked by secondary agricultural science teachers
author_facet Abdul Latir, Siti Shuhaidah
Whittington, M. Susie
author_sort Abdul Latir, Siti Shuhaidah
title Types and cognitive levels of questions asked by secondary agricultural science teachers
title_short Types and cognitive levels of questions asked by secondary agricultural science teachers
title_full Types and cognitive levels of questions asked by secondary agricultural science teachers
title_fullStr Types and cognitive levels of questions asked by secondary agricultural science teachers
title_full_unstemmed Types and cognitive levels of questions asked by secondary agricultural science teachers
title_sort types and cognitive levels of questions asked by secondary agricultural science teachers
publisher Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia
publishDate 2019
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/76815/1/ICERP_2019-20.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/76815/
_version_ 1662756576273891328
score 13.211869