Corpus-based study of lexical bundles in academic lectures across three disciplinary divisions
Simply defined as extended collocations, lexical bundles are combination of more than two words which co-occur frequently in a given register (Biber et al., 1999). They lead to coherence in text or speech and play a key role in fluent linguistic production. Recent decades have witnessed an inc...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/71016/1/FBMK%202015%2093%20IR.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/71016/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Simply defined as extended collocations, lexical bundles are combination of more
than two words which co-occur frequently in a given register (Biber et al., 1999).
They lead to coherence in text or speech and play a key role in fluent linguistic
production. Recent decades have witnessed an increasing body of research on lexical
bundles; however, there is still a question of whether these expressions are used
differently in academic speech of different disciplinary divisions. To this aim, this
study investigates and compares the frequency, structure and discourse function of
the most frequently occurring four-word lexical bundles in academic lectures across
three broad disciplinary groupings, namely social sciences, physical sciences and life
and medical sciences.
This comparative study was run on the nearly one million word corpus of 120
academic lectures (40 from each science). The lectures were transactional in nature
and sourced from British Academic Spoken English (BASE) corpus. The most
frequent four-word bundles were identified in each corpus using the computer
program WordSmith Tools 5 (Scott, 2008). Then, the structural and functional
taxonomies proposed by Biber et al. (2004) were used as analytical frameworks to
group lexical bundles in terms of their grammatical types and the discourse functions
they serve.
Primary findings revealed some variations between the three sciences in relation to
the distributional patterns of the target bundles. In addition, the three groups of
lecturers also showed different tendencies towards the selection of grammatical types
to form lexical bundles and the functions that the bundles carried out in academic
lectures. The results suggest that the selection of bundle types and the way they are
used to fulfill disciplinary functions in the academic lectures are to a large extent
disciplinary-bounded. Some bundles were also found to be specific to each corpus.
Disciplinary lecturers appeared to have their own specific ways of selecting lexical
bundles to convey disciplinary materials in a way to be as comprehensible as
possible for the audiences. Based on the obtained results, it can be suggested that
lexical bundles are considered as a pivotal means in distinguishing the academic
speech of different fields of studies. The implication of this study direct itself to the novice (especially those working in ESL/EFL settings) academic lecturers belonging
to sciences under investigation. Findings of this study open more windows to how
lexical bundles and their communicative functions are employed in academic
disciplinary lectures. Students who study in these sciences could also benefit from
findings of this research by being familiarized with the structural and functional
characteristics of lexical bundles. |
|---|